"Dominic J. Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could we change the PAM code so that it tries to run the PAM auth cycle
>> immediately on receipt of a connection request? If it gets a callback
>> for a password, it abandons the PAM conversation, sends off a password
>> request packet, and then
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dominic J. Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Could we change the PAM code so that it tries to run the PAM auth cycle
> >> immediately on receipt of a connection request? If it gets a callback
> >> for a password, it abandons the PAM conversation, se
Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Every table has a implicit column oid. Does this column have an index on it?
No, you must create an index if you want one.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: sub
I am going to add MD5 authentication to ODBC. What is a good way to get
backend/libpq/md5.c into odbc for compilation. I know people want the
ODBC to be stand-alone.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If
This may sound like a stupid question, and i apologize if it is, but I
couldn't find the answer in any documentation.
Every table has a implicit column oid. Does this column have an index on it?
I assume not, and I am putting an index on it anyway.
The real problem is that I have a table like t
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> > Maybe we should not touch getdatabaseencoding() right now, given that the
> > names we currently use are apparently almost correct anyway and
> > considering the pain it creates to alter them, and instead implement the
> > information schema views in the future?
>
> I tho
Peter T Mount wrote:
> Quoting Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > TEXT is a datatype which stores character data of unspecified length (up
> > to
> > the max value of a 4 byte integer in length, although I've seen
> > comments
> > indicating that the practical limit is closer to 1 GB -- not sur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sounds like there aren't objections to my requested function,
get_last_returned_oid(). I'm going to work on the function call for
postgres this weekend.
Purpose: Retain the last oid returned (if any) in a variable
associated with the conn
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, David Ford wrote:
>
>>It's all in the configuration. I slam mails around dozens of machines
>>in seconds using sendmail and I process a lot of mail.
>>
>
>So have you patched for the latest of the many sendmail root exploits?
>
>Vince.
>
I keep my sy
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Can someone comment on this?
I sent him some concerns I had (including the fact that we
can't rename ON UPDATE since it's in the spec). I'm working
through some more behavioral concerns I have, but I haven't
decided whether or not they're actually pro
> So, rather than going over everone's IANAL opinons about mixing
> licenses, let's just let Massimo know that it'd just be a lot
> easier to PostgreSQL/BSD license the whole thing, if he doesn't
> mind too much.
Yes, it would be better.
Vadim
---(end of broadcast)--
Uh, guys? The last thing I can find that Massimo says about the license
is this, from Sunday:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:15:54PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
>
> Regarding the licencing of the code, I always release my code under GPL,
> which is the licence I prefer, but my code in the backen
Bruce Momjian wrote:
...
>Yes, that is probably it. The GPL doesn't give anything to users, it
>takes some control away from users and gives it to the author of the
>code.
Correction - it takes away from the *distributor* of binaries the right to
give users fewer rights than he has. If he
> Because the code we got from Berkeley was BSD licensed, we
> can't change it, and because many of us like the BSD license
> better because we don't want to require them to release the
> source code, we just want them to use PostgreSQL. And we
> think they will release the source code eventually
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main b
> > Besides, anyone who actually wanted to use the userlock
> > code would need only to write their own wrapper functions
> > to get around the GPL license.
>
> This is a part of copyright law that eludes me - can i write
> a replacement function for something so simple that it can
> essentially
Hi Justin, Andrew,
I am making doing some essential face lift on it right
now, Once I am done I will send you the URL.
Amandeep
--- Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amandeep,
>
> Do you have an URL for your application?
>
> :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
>
> Oops I'm referring to client side cursors in our ODBC
> driver. We have no cross-transaction cursors yet though
> I'd like to see a backend cross-transaction cursor also.
Ops, sorry.
BTW, what are "visibility" rules for ODBC cross-tx cursor?
No Repeatable reads, no Serializability?
Do you hold s
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM
> > I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not
> > for
> > any other reason then for confusing people and making them have
> > discussions
> > like this.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM
> > I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not
> > for
> > any other reason then for confusing people and making them have
> > discussions
> > like this.
>
>
> No, that's just a coincidence. The reason that TOAST limits fields to
> 1Gb is that the high-order two bits of the varlena length word were
> commandeered as TOAST state indicators. There are now only thirty bits
> available to represent the length of a variable-length Datum; hence the
> hard
Can someone comment on this?
> Hi people!.I developed a work for an university course, which I wish to share with
>you.
>
> I extended the foreign key clause in the create table in order to permit insertions
>and updates on a referencing table (a table with foreign key
> attributes) with all
I have applied the attached patch that is basically your patch with
Tom's suggestion to use HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS.
> Hi,
>
> There are two problems when compiling libpq.dll and psql.exe
> on Windows. I'm not sure it is the best way to fix them
> (see patch below.) Comments?
>
> Regards,
> Mikhai
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
> >
>
> > Yes, the weird part is that the BSD license is so lax (don't sue us)
> > that it is the addition of the GPL that changes the affect of the
> > license. If you added a BSD license to a GPL'ed piece of code, the
> > effect would be near zero.
>
> Sorry for asking this off-topic question, but I
I noticed while testing the preceeding patch for resultmap, that we
use /bin/ld -G to build the .so's. THIS DOESN'T WORK on UnixWare and
OpenUNIX 8.
Where can I change this to use cc -G?
Larry
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a part of copyright law that eludes me - can i write a
> > replacement
> > function for something so simple that it can essentially be done in one
> > way only (like incrementing a value by one) ?
>
> Sure, if you don't cut and paste the code line by line,
> That's good information, now I have a better idea what I am looking for. I am
> using Source Navigator (good recommendation I got reading this list). I am
> basically just trying to find either variables that can be declared const, or
> inconsistancies (as Chris mentions).
>
> If anyone else
Peter T Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> indicating that the practical limit is closer to 1 GB -- not sure why).
> It may be something to do with the 1Gb splitting of the physical files
> representing a table...
No, that's just a coincidence. The r
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Can I ask why we are mentioning the changelog for the release and not
> the list from the HISTORY file? Any why are we putting the changelog in
> the tarball anyway? Seems that could easily go on a web site.
The point of these changelogs was to show the changes between
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
>
I was incorrect in something I said to Vadim. I said s
Tom Lane writes:
> Yeah, people have started to use 'const' in new code, but the older
> stuff doesn't use it, which means that the net effect is probably
> more annoyance than help. I'm afraid that if we attack this in an
> incremental way, we'll end up with code that may have a lot of const
>
> > > BTW, what's wrong with "encoding"? I don't think, for example EUC-JP
> > > or utf-8, are character set names.
> >
> > Hmm, SQL talks of character sets, it has a CHARACTER_SETS view and such.
> > It's slightly incorrect, I agree.
> >
> > Maybe we should not touch getdatabaseencoding() right
Quoting Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> TEXT is a datatype which stores character data of unspecified length (up
> to
> the max value of a 4 byte integer in length, although I've seen
> comments
> indicating that the practical limit is closer to 1 GB -- not sure why).
It may be something to do
This is from the jdbc list. Is there any way to get fully qualified
column names?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Carterette
Sent: August 16, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Rene Pijlman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDBC] select on mul
Just a test ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, David Ford wrote:
> It's all in the configuration. I slam mails around dozens of machines
> in seconds using sendmail and I process a lot of mail.
So have you patched for the latest of the many sendmail root exploits?
Vince.
--
Hi Amandeep,
Do you have an URL for your application?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Amandeep Singh wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
> Just wanted to let you all know that I have been
> working on development of financial applications
> using,java, javascript, javabeans and of course
> Po
> It's in the configuration. I run much more than the above and have no
> issues at all.
Yeah, some people shouldn't have root even if they own the machine.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgres
39 matches
Mail list logo
