> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
> > >
> >
> > I was incorrect in something I said to Vadim. I said stored procedures
> > would have to be released if linked against a GPL'ed backend.
>
> Only to those you actually distribute this product to. If you're using
> it internally, you have no obligations to release it to anyone, to
> give one example.
Yes, I was speaking only of selling the software. Good point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
