Thank you for the patch.
I applied this patch manually to the master branch, resolving a conflict
in `numeric.h`. It successfully passed both `make check` and `make
check-world`.
Best regards,
David
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 09:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > I've adjusted the comments to what you mentioned and also leaned out
> > the pretty expensive test case to something that'll run much faster
> > and pushed the result.
>
> drongo and fairywren are consistently failing the
David Rowley writes:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 09:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> drongo and fairywren are consistently failing the test case added
>> by this commit. I'm not quite sure why the behavior of Memoize
>> would be platform-specific when we're dealing with integers,
>> but ...
> Maybe snprintf
Hello, meson developer here.
On 1/23/24 4:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 22.01.24 21:04, Tristan Partin wrote:
>> I am not really following why we can't use the builtin Meson dist
>> command. The only difference from my testing is it doesn't use a
>> --prefix argument.
>
> Here are some pro
Hackers,
I wanted to try to customize the subdirectory for an extension. The docs[1] say:
> directory (string)
>
> The directory containing the extension's SQL script file(s). Unless an
> absolute path is given, the name is relative to the installation's SHAREDIR
> directory. The default behav
On Jan 26, 2024, at 4:40 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> But it doesn’t seem to work. I tried this experiment:
I made a simpler test case here:
https://github.com/theory/test-extension-directory
Not the difference between actual and expected output.
Best,
David
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 21:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I see a possibility of disabling reporting as possibly dangerous. Without
> reporting encoding you can break psql. So it should be limited just to few
> values where is known behave.
I agree that client_encoding is a GUC that likely all clie
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 18:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Yeah, I see that point of view as well. I like the end result; the
> additional protos in libpq-int.h don't bother me. Does anybody else
> wants to share their opinion on it? If none, then I'd consider going
> ahead with this version.
To be
On Jan 26, 2024, at 5:05 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I made a simpler test case here:
>
> https://github.com/theory/test-extension-directory
>
> Not the difference between actual and expected output.
Bah! Need to also set `MODULEDIR = extension/click` and then it works.
D
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:46 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:21 PM James Coleman wrote:
> > >
> > > See rebased patch attached.
> >
> > I just realized I left a change in during the rebase that wasn't necessary.
> >
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 16:37, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:31 AM Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > >
> > > Next steps:
> > > - Break the patch into a series of smaller patches.
> > > - Add TAP tests (test the ability to actually login with these passwords)
> > > - Add/update documen
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 05:41, fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp
wrote:
>
> Hi Mr.Haas.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Haas
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:25 PM
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:41 AM fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp
> > wrote:
> > > Are you conc
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 22:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Richard Guo writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 6:41 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Thanks for the report! I guess we need something like the attached.
>
> > +1.
>
> Pushed, thanks for looking at it.
I have changed the status of the commitfest entry to
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 21:58, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 03:56, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>> > On 25 Apr 2023, at 16:47, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>> > Patch attached with comments removed
>>
>> This patch no longer applies, please submit a rebased version on
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:28:43PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 5:45 AM Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:23:39AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > I found that this patch was committed at d3c5f37dd5 and changed the
> > > error message in postgres_fdw slightly.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 10:48, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:39 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
> >
> > The patch set is thus
> > 0001 - patch used to measure memory used during planning
> >
> > 0002 - Patch to free intermediate Relids computed by
> > adjust_child_relids_multileve
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 16:25, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>
> Here is fresh version with the pg_dump.pl regex fixed. Now it must pass
> buildfarm.
>
> Under development:
> 1. Explanation of the general idea in comments (Robert's note)
> 2. Issue with hiding some optimizations (Alexander's note and examp
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 16:56, Melih Mutlu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> torikoshia , 4 Ara 2023 Pzt, 07:59 tarihinde şunu
> yazdı:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I also think this change would be helpful.
>>
>> I imagine you're working on the Andres's comments and you already notice
>> this, but v1 patch cannot be applied
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 14:25, Richard Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 4:00 AM David Rowley wrote:
>>
>> If you write some tests for this code, it will be useful to prove that
>> it actually does something, and also that it does not break again in
>> the future. I don't really want to jus
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 10:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 09:25:16AM +0100, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
> > From what I can tell, there's no change in the behaviour. All paths
> > would eventually go through HandleSlashCmds's cleaning logic. This is
> > also mentioned in ignore
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 13:25, Richard Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:00 PM Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>>
>> Please look at a warning and an assertion failure triggered by the
>> following script:
>> set parallel_setup_cost = 0;
>> set parallel_tuple_cost = 0;
>> set min_parallel_table_sca
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 20:28, Daniel Verite wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> PFA a rebased version.
CFBot shows that the patch does not apply anymore as in [1]:
=== Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
a3a836fb5e51183eae624d43225279306c2285b8 ===
=== applying patch
./v5-0001-Implement-retrieval-of-
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 21:50, Matthias van de Meent
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 00:36, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > Most of the work with something like
> > this is the analysis of the trade-offs, not writing code. There are
> > all kinds of trade-offs that you could make with something like
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 18:50, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Attached is a v10 rebase of this patch which had undergone significant bitrot
> due to recent changes in the pg_upgrade check phase. This brings in the
> changes into the proposed structure without changes to queries, with no
> additional
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:42 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Here is the V69 patch set which includes the following changes.
>
> V69-0001, V69-0002
>
Few minor comments on v69-0001
1. In libpqrcv_create_slot(), I see we are using two types of syntaxes
based on 'use_new_options_syntax' (aka ser
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 12:22, John Naylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I'm not conveying the problem this is solving -- I'm happy to go
> > one more round trying to make it clearer -- but if this is not clear,
> > it'd be good to at develop an al
Hello,
27.01.2024 00:09, Tom Lane wrote:
David Rowley writes:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 09:41, Tom Lane wrote:
drongo and fairywren are consistently failing the test case added
by this commit. I'm not quite sure why the behavior of Memoize
would be platform-specific when we're dealing with int
> On 20 Jan 2024, at 08:31, vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 09:49, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 5:02 AM vignesh C wrote:
>>> does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
>>>
>> Thanks! Here's the rebase.
>
> I'm seeing that there h
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:54, Daniel Verite wrote:
>
> Shlok Kyal wrote:
>
> > > The error was corrected and a new diff file was created.
> > > The diff file was created based on 16 RC1.
> > > We confirmed that 5 places where errors occurred when performing
> > > make check were changed to
Hello Robert,
26.01.2024 21:37, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:39 PM Nathan Bossart
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:04:37AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Here is v2 with that addition.
Looks reasonable.
Thanks for the report & review. I have committed that version.
While try
so 27. 1. 2024 v 0:04 odesílatel Jelte Fennema-Nio
napsal:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 21:35, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
> > I see a possibility of disabling reporting as possibly dangerous.
> Without reporting encoding you can break psql. So it should be limited just
> to few values where is known beh
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
