> On 21 Jun 2023, at 07:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-06-21 11:53:44 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have been annoyed by these in the past when doing backpatches, as
>> this creates some noise, and the only place where this counts is
>> sha2_openssl.c. Thoughts about doing something lik
On 2023-Jun-21, Peter Smith wrote:
> Except, please note that there are already multiple message format
> strings in the HEAD code that look like "%s for subscription ...",
> that are using the get_worker_name() function for the name
> substitution.
>
> e.g.
> - "%s for subscription \"%s\" will s
Hi hackers,
Please find attached a patch to truncate (in ProcessStartupPacket())
the port->database_name and port->user_name in such a way to not break
multibyte character boundary.
Indeed, currently, one could create a database that way:
postgres=# create database ä
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Agreed, I'd be more inclined to go with OPENSSL_API_COMPAT. If we still get
> warnings with that set then I feel those warrant special consideration rather
> than a blanket suppression.
4d3db136 seems to be OK on REL_13_STABLE w
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:42 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> So I am wondering if you're encountering a different kind of problem. As I
> mentioned, I have observed that the pages need to be clean for this to
> work. For me adding a "sync path/to/postgres" makes it work on 6.3.8.
Without
> the sync it
On 21.06.23 09:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
Agreed, I'd be more inclined to go with OPENSSL_API_COMPAT. If we still get
warnings with that set then I feel those warrant special consideration rather
than a blanket suppression.
4d
At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:43:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand"
wrote in
> Trying to connect with the 64 bytes name:
>
> $ psql -d
> psql: error: connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.55448"
> failed: FATAL: database "äää" does not
>
On 20.06.23 17:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+1, although I wonder if we shouldn't follow pgindent's new lead
and require some argument(s).
That makes sense to me. Here is a small update with this behavior
change and associated documentation update.
I'm intending to add some of the new pgindent
First off, thanks for the quick reaction and reviews, I appreciate it.
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 14:14 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> But that won't connect work as the segment requested is now a partial
> one in the primary's pg_wal, still the standby wants it.
I think since 009_twophase.pl doesn't
Looks good to me. Tested on master and it works.
New patch used a bool flag to avoid calls for both FDW and custom hook's
call. And a slight change in comment of "has_pseudoconstant_clauses"
function.
Regards,
Nishant.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:19 PM Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Julian Markwort wrote:
> I see you've already undone it.
> Attached is a patch for 009_twophase.pl to just try this corner case at the
> very end, so as not to influence other
> existing tests in suite.
>
> When I run this on REL_14_8 I get the error agai
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 9:24 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > The other idea that came across my mind was to provide some schema
> > mapping kind of feature on subscribers where we could route the tuples
> > from table X to table Y provided th
Hi,
I was trying to add WAL stats to pg_stat_io. While doing that I was
comparing pg_stat_wal and pg_stat_io's WAL stats and there was some
inequality between the total number of WALs. I found that the difference
comes from bgwriter's WALs. bgwriter generates WAL but it doesn't flush
them because
On 2023-06-21 We 05:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 20.06.23 17:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+1, although I wonder if we shouldn't follow pgindent's new lead
and require some argument(s).
That makes sense to me. Here is a small update with this behavior
change and associated documentation updat
I define a table user_ranks as such:
CREATE TABLE user_ranks (
id INTEGER GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
rank INTEGER NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT "by (rank, id)" UNIQUE (rank, id)
);
INSERT INTO user_ranks (user_id, rank) SELECT generate_series(1, 1),
generate_series(1, 1);
Her
Hi,
David Rowley wrote:
>I've adjusted the attached patch to do that.
I think that was room for more improvements.
1. bms_member_index Bitmapset can be const.
2. Only compute BITNUM when necessary.
3. Avoid enlargement when nwords is equal wordnum.
Can save cycles when in corner cases?
Just
Hello,
I've cc'd Jeff Davis on this due to a conversation we had at PGCon
about applying filters on index tuples during index scans.
I've also cc'd Andres Freund because I think this relates to his
musing in [1] that:
> One thing I have been wondering around this is whether we should not have
> s
Hello,
While at PGCon I was chatting with Andres (and I think Peter G. and a
few others who I can't remember at the moment, apologies) and Andres
noted that while we opportunistically prune a page when inserting a
tuple (before deciding we need a new page) we don't do the same for
updates.
Attach
(to be clear I only skimmed the end of this thread and did not look at
all the previous messages)
I took a quick look at the first patch (about deparsing table ddl) and
it seems like this would also be very useful for a SHOW CREATE TABLE,
like command. Which was suggested in this thread:
https://w
On 6/21/23 05:37, Bəxtiyar Neyman wrote:
> I define a table user_ranks as such:
>
> CREATE TABLE user_ranks (
> id INTEGER GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
> rank INTEGER NOT NULL,
> CONSTRAINT "by (rank, id)" UNIQUE (rank, id)
> );
>
> INSERT INTO user_ranks (user_id, rank) SELE
Hi,
In the "Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction" discussion, one
sub-thread [1] was about having a credible use case for tailoring collations
with custom rules, a new feature in v16.
At a conference this week I was asked if ICU could be able to
sort like EBCDIC [2]. It turns out it has
Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
> At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:43:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand"
> wrote in
>> Trying to connect with the 64 bytes name:
>> $ psql -d
>> psql: error: connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.55448"
>> failed: FATAL: database "
Hello! In continuation of the topic I would like to suggest solution.
This patch adds several checks to the vulnerable functions above.diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c
index d85e313908..102d0e1574 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c
+++
Hi,
On 6/21/23 3:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:43:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand"
wrote in
Trying to connect with the 64 bytes name:
$ psql -d
psql: error: connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.55448"
failed: F
On 21.06.23 13:35, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If not, part of my patch would still be useful. Maybe I should commit
my posted patch for PG16, to keep consistency with pgindent, and then
your work would presumably be considered for PG17.
That sounds like a good plan.
done
On 2023-06-21 11:59, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:27:36 +0900, torikoshia
wrote in
On 2023-06-19 14:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:24:29AM +0900, torikoshia wrote:
>> Thanks, now I understand what you meant.
> If I may ask, why is the refactoring of 0
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 13:04, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to add WAL stats to pg_stat_io. While doing that I was comparing
> pg_stat_wal and pg_stat_io's WAL stats and there was some inequality between
> the total number of WALs. I found that the difference comes from bgwri
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:43:38AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
>> IMHO, I'm not sure we should allow connections without the exact name
>> being provided. In that sense, I think we might want to consider
>> outright rejecting the estblishment of a connection when the given
>
On 6/21/23 14:45, James Coleman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've cc'd Jeff Davis on this due to a conversation we had at PGCon
> about applying filters on index tuples during index scans.
>
> I've also cc'd Andres Freund because I think this relates to his
> musing in [1] that:
>> One thing I have bee
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 09:59:11AM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> > Therefore, it seems like it would be near-zero cost to just call conn =
> > GetConnection() and then PQserverVersion(conn), and ReleaseConnection().
> > You can then use the return value of PQserverVersion() to determine if
> >
On 6/21/23 09:28, Daniel Verite wrote:
In the "Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction" discussion, one
sub-thread [1] was about having a credible use case for tailoring collations
with custom rules, a new feature in v16.
At a conference this week I was asked if ICU could be able to
sort li
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 18:03, Matthias van de Meent <
boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 13:04, Nazir Bilal Yavuz
wrote:
> > I was trying to add WAL stats to pg_stat_io. While doing that I was
comparing pg_stat_wal and pg_stat_io's WAL
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:28 +0200, Daniel Verite wrote:
> At a conference this week I was asked if ICU could be able to
> sort like EBCDIC [2]. It turns out it has been already asked on
> -general a few years ago [3] with no satisfactory answer at the time
> ,
> and that it can be implemented with
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:28 AM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/21/23 14:45, James Coleman wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've cc'd Jeff Davis on this due to a conversation we had at PGCon
> > about applying filters on index tuples during index scans.
> >
> > I've also cc'd Andres Freund because I th
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 07:53 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am not sure to understand this last sentence. REINDEX on a
> partitioned table builds a list of the indexes to work on in the
> first
> transaction processing the command in ReindexPartitions(), and there
> is no need to process partiti
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 15:52 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> At the moment, I think I'm inclined to call this "existing behavior"
> since
> we didn't check privileges for each partition in this case even
> before
> MAINTAIN was introduced. IIUC we still process the individual
> partitions
> in v15 r
Hi,
On 2023-06-21 10:11:33 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.06.23 09:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Agreed, I'd be more inclined to go with OPENSSL_API_COMPAT. If we still
> > > get
> > > warnings with that set then I
Thomas Munro wrote:
> What could we do that would be helpful here, without affecting users
> of the "true" C.UTF-8 for the rest of time? This is a Debian (+
> downstream distro) only problem as far as we know so far, and only
> for Debian 11 and older.
It seems to include RedHat-based di
On 6/21/23 12:14 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:28 +0200, Daniel Verite wrote:
At a conference this week I was asked if ICU could be able to
sort like EBCDIC [2]. It turns out it has been already asked on
-general a few years ago [3] with no satisfactory answer at the time
,
and
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 3:28 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jacob Champion
> wrote:
> > Making it a subscriber-side feature
> > requires tight coupling between the two peers, though. (For the
> > timescaledb case, how does the subscriber know which new partitions
> > be
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 09:15:18PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Perhaps we should add something like
>
> Note that while REINDEX on a partitioned index or table requires
> MAINTAIN on the partitioned table, such commands skip the privilege
> checks when processing the individua
On 6/20/23 5:02 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
Status on collation loose ends:
1. There's an open item "Switch to ICU for 17". It's a little bit
confusing exactly what that means, and the CF entry refers to two
items, one of which is the build-time default to --with-icu. As far as
I know, building with
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:12:44PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The argv elements get shuffled around many times with the
> patch. However, I couldn't find a way to decrease the count without
> resorting to a forward scan. So I've concluded the current approach
> is them most effeicient, cons
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:20:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's annoyed me for some time that to_timestamp() doesn't implement
> the TZ format code that to_char() has. I finally got motivated to
> do something about that after the complaint at [1] that jsonpath's
> datetime() method can't read ty
On 6/21/23 20:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:20:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It's annoyed me for some time that to_timestamp() doesn't implement
the TZ format code that to_char() has. I finally got motivated to
do something about that after the complaint at [1] that jsonpath
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 6:35 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/15/23 22:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Tomas Vondra writes:
> >> On 6/15/23 22:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I see zero leakage in that example after applying the attached quick
> >>> hack. (It might be better to make the check in the caller
Hi,
I'm hacking on this bugfix again, thanks to Evgeny's reminder on the other
thread [1].
I've been adding checks for partiall-dropped databases to the following places
so far:
- vac_truncate_clog(), as autovacuum can't process it anymore. Otherwise a
partially dropped database could easily l
On 6/21/23 4:22 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
Hi,
On 6/21/23 3:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:43:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand"
wrote in
Trying to connect with the 64 bytes name:
$ psql -d
psql: error: connection to
On 6/21/23 18:17, James Coleman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:28 AM Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/21/23 14:45, James Coleman wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've cc'd Jeff Davis on this due to a conversation we had at PGCon
>>> about applying filters on index tuples during index scans.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:02:49PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Please find attached a patch doing so (which is basically a revert of
> d18c1d1f51).
LGTM. I think this can wait for v17 since the current behavior has been
around since 2001 and AFAIK this is the first report. While it's argu
On 6/21/23 20:37, Bəxtiyar Neyman wrote:
> Thanks Tomas for the lengthy write-up!
>
> Pardon the noise in the queries (LATERAL, AND true etc): they were
> autogenerated by the library we wrote.
>
I know, but it makes them harder to read for people. If you want people
to respond it's generally a
Hi all,
I briefly mentioned this issue in another mailing thread [0].
Currently, a user is allowed to execute SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION [1]
if the role they connected to PostgreSQL with was a superuser at the
time of connection. Even if the role is later altered to no longer be a
superuser, the s
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 04:28:43PM -0400, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> Currently, a user is allowed to execute SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION [1]
> if the role they connected to PostgreSQL with was a superuser at the
> time of connection. Even if the role is later altered to no longer be a
> superuser, the
Hi,
When vac_truncate_clog() returns early, due to one of these paths:
/*
* Do not truncate CLOG if we seem to have suffered wraparound already;
* the computed minimum XID might be bogus. This case should now be
* impossible due to the defenses in GetNewTransac
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:32:46PM -0700, Will Mortensen wrote:
> MERGE is now a data-modification command too.
Yes, this has been applied too.
--
Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is import
I saw, thanks again!
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:08 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:32:46PM -0700, Will Mortensen wrote:
> > MERGE is now a data-modification command too.
>
> Yes, this has been applied too.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us
> EDB
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-May-31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I guess we could try looking for pg_bsd_indent-$MAJOR_VERSION first,
> > then pg_bsd_indent.
>
> Do you mean with $MAJOR_VERSION being Postgres' version? That means we
> need to install a
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> LGTM. I think this can wait for v17 since the current behavior has been
> around since 2001 and AFAIK this is the first report. While it's arguably
> a bug fix, the patch also breaks some cases that work today.
Agreed that anythin
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:11:33AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Backpatching the OPENSSL_API_COMPAT change would set the minimum OpenSSL
> version to 1.0.1, which is newer than what was so far required in those
> branches. That is the reason we didn't do this.
Looking at the relevant thread f
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:13 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> FWIW, I'm almost certain that I'll completely run out of ERRORs to
> demote to LOGs before too long. In fact, this might very well be the
> last ERROR that I ever have to demote to a LOG to harden nbtree
> VACUUM.
Pushed this just now, bac
Hi,
On 2023-06-21 15:12:08 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> When vac_truncate_clog() returns early, due to one of these paths:
>
> [...]
>
> Separately, I think it's quite bad that we *silently* return from
> vac_truncate_clog() when finding a bogus xid. That's a quite severe condition,
> we should a
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:26:09AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> What I meant is that if you do:
>
> CREATE TABLE p(i INT, j INT) PARTITION BY RANGE (i);
> CREATE TABLE p0 PARTITION OF p FOR VALUES FROM (00) TO (10);
> CREATE TABLE p1 PARTITION OF p FOR VALUES FROM (10) TO (20);
> CREATE INDE
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 7:43 AM Jelte Fennema wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 18:57, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> > Can this get turned into a Patch? Were you offering this code up for
> others (me?) to pull, and work into a patch?
> > [If I do the patch, I am not sure it gives you the value of reducing
>
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 23:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I think it's probably worth adjusting the docs to mention this. It
>> seems like it might be something that could surprise someone.
>>
>> Something like the attached, maybe?
>
> +1
Ok, I pushed that patch. Thanks.
David
Dear hackers,
(CC: Önder because he owned the related thread)
This is a follow-up thread of [1]. The commit allowed subscribers to use indexes
other than PK and REPLICA IDENTITY when REPLICA IDENTITY is FULL on publisher,
but the index must be a B-tree. In this proposal, I aim to extend this
func
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:16:24AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> I think that there is a testing gap with the coverage of CLUSTER.
>> "Ownership of partitions is checked" is a test that looks for the case
>> where regress_ptnowner owns the partitioned table and one of its
>> partitions, checking
At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:52:26 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz
wrote in
> I attached a WIP patch for showing WAL stats in pg_stat_io.
Yeah, your diagnosis appears accurate. I managed to trigger an
assertion failure quite easily when I added
"Assert(!pgstat_have_pending_wal()) just after the call to
pgst
Hi,
On 2023-05-09 15:41:36 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> +# FIXME: It'd be good to test the actual interruption path. But it's not
> +# immediately obvious how.
>
> I wonder if there is some way to incorporate something based on
> SIGSTOP signals into the test, but I don't know how to do it on
> W
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:46:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:16:24AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> I think that there is a testing gap with the coverage of CLUSTER.
>>> "Ownership of partitions is checked" is a test that looks for the case
>>> where regress_ptnow
On 2023-06-20 18:26, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
The followings are TODO items.
* to check that meson.build works since I tested with old command
`make` now
I test with meson and I updated the patches to work with it.
My test procedure is the following.
```
export builddir=/mnt/tmp/build
export pre
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:57 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell 72e78d831a as-is is just bogus. Unfortunately that likely
> also means 3ba59ccc89 is not right.
>
Indeed. I was thinking of a fix but couldn't find one yet. One idea I
am considering is to allow catalog table locks aft
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 04:28:43PM -0400, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> + roleTup = SearchSysCache1(AUTHOID,
> ObjectIdGetDatum(AuthenticatedUserId));
> + if (!HeapTupleIsValid(roleTup))
> + ereport(FATAL,
> +
> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_AUTHORIZATION_SPE
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 7:17 AM Wei Wang (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Thur, Jun 8, 2023 20:02 PM shveta malik wrote:
> > Thank You Vignesh for handling (a), Ajin for handling (b), Shi-san and
> > Hou-san for contributing in (c).
> >
> > The new changes are in patch 0001, 0002, 0005 and 0008.
>
> Thank
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:53 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:27 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > As far as I can tell 72e78d831a as-is is just bogus. Unfortunately that
> > likely
> > also means 3ba59ccc89 is not right.
>
> Quite possibly. But I maintain that ginInsertCleanu
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 00:16, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> 2. Only compute BITNUM when necessary.
I doubt this will help. The % 64 done by BITNUM will be transformed
to an AND operation by the compiler which is likely going to be single
instruction latency on most CPUs which probably amounts to it bei
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:12:08PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> When vac_truncate_clog() returns early
...
> we haven't released the lwlock that we acquired earlier
> Until there's some cause for the session to call LWLockReleaseAll(), the lock
> is held. Until then neither the process holding th
Hi Mr.Momjian, Mr.Pyhalov, hackers.
> From: Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 12:44 AM
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 09:59:11AM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> > > Therefore, it seems like it would be near-zero cost to just call
> > > conn =
> > > GetConnection() and then PQserverVersio
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023, at 18:25, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 6/20/23 16:56, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> The reference to consistency with what we do elsewhere might not be entirely
>> applicable in this context, since the set feature we're designing is a new
>> beast
>> in the SQL landscape.
>
> I don't s
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:49:05 -0700
"Tristan Partin" wrote:
> On Mon Jun 19, 2023 at 6:39 AM PDT, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2023 08:58:46 -0500
> > "Tristan Partin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue May 23, 2023 at 7:31 PM CDT, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:02:02AM -
Hi,
On 6/22/23 1:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
LGTM. I think this can wait for v17 since the current behavior has been
around since 2001 and AFAIK this is the first report. While it's arguably
a bug fix, the patch also breaks som
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:02 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> FYI - I have created and tested back-patches for Amit's v5 patch,
> going all the way to REL_10_STABLE.
>
Pushed. I haven't used PG10 patch as REL_10_STABLE is out of support now.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
81 matches
Mail list logo
