At Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:43:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote in > Trying to connect with the 64 bytes name: > > $ psql -d ääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääää > psql: error: connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.55448" > failed: FATAL: database "äääääääääääääääääääääääääääääää" does not > exist
IMHO, I'm not sure we should allow connections without the exact name being provided. In that sense, I think we might want to consider outright rejecting the estblishment of a connection when the given database name doesn't fit the startup packet, since the database with the exact given name cannot be found. While it is somewhat off-topic, I cannot establish a connection if the console encoding differs from the template database even if I provide the identical database name. (I don't mean I want that behavior to be "fix"ed.) regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
