On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 5:15 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:28 AM movead...@highgo.ca
> wrote:
> > Issue one:
> > Get a Assert error at 'Assert(bms_is_member(i, node->as_needrequest));' in
> > ExecAppendAsyncRequest() function when I use more than two foreign table
> > on di
Hello Stephen,
I'm unsure about what is the "common use case". ISTM that having the
postgres process holding the master key looks like a "no" for me in any use
case with actual security concern: as the database must be remotely
accessible, a reasonable security assumption is that a pg account c
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 12:31:45PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that this is bugfix that needs to be back-patched?
The slru-truncate-modulo patch fixes a bug. The slru-truncate-t-insurance
patch does not. Neither _needs_ to be back-patched, though I'm proposing to
bac
On 02-01-2021 08:36, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 7:37 PM Luc Vlaming wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to speed up bulk data loading/transforming I noticed that
considerable time is spent in the relation extension lock.
We already do extend the relation in bulk when there is a contenti
On 01-01-2021 19:55, Zhihong Yu wrote:
Hi, Luc:
Happy New Year.
Looking at BufferAllocExtend()
in v1-0002-WIP-buffer-alloc-specialized-for-relation-extensi.patch. it
seems there is duplicate code with the existing BufferAlloc().
It would be good if some refactoring is done by extracting comm
Hi Fabien
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 at 09:50, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
...
> ISTM that pg at the core level should (only) directly provide:
>
> (1) a per-file encryption scheme, with loadable (hook-replaceable
> functions??) to manage pages, maybe:
>
>encrypt(page_id, *key, *clear_page, *encrypted_pag
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 08:21:55PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> čt 31. 12. 2020 v 15:27 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com>
> napsal:
>
> the tests passed and filling gaps works well
>
> but creating empty objects doesn't work
>
> create table foo(a jsonb);
>
> insert into foo value
On Wednesday, December 30, 2020 8:58 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:28 AM Tang, Haiying
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> > In last
> >
> mail(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/66851e198f6b41eda59e625718
> 2
> > 564b6%40G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local),
> > I've sent you t
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > I think enough people use data checksums these days that it warrants to
> > be moved into the "normal part", like in the attached.
>
> +1. Let's see first what others th
Hello, hackers.
Working on some stuff, I realized I do not understand why
latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid (in different types of WAL records) are
sent every time they appear on the primary side.
latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid is used to call
ResolveRecoveryConflictWithSnapshot and cancel conflicting b
Hi!
I was looking to review something in CF. This seems like a thread of some
interest to me.
Recently we had somewhat related incident. Do I understand correctly that this
incident is related to the bug discussed in this thread?
Primary instance was killed by OOM
[ 2020-11-12 15:27:03.732 MSK
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 21:23 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> But you cannot seriously argue that a one line patch that changes
> user
> visible behavior can be acceptable in Postgres core without tests or
> docs or code comments.
Hi Simon,
Often, good documented APIs come about after a few extensions
It looks like macOS doesn't have pthread barriers (via cfbot 2021, now
with more operating systems):
Indeed:-(
I'll look into that.
Just for fun, the attached 0002 patch is a quick prototype of a
replacement for that stuff that seems to work OK on a Mac here. (I'm
not sure if the Windows
Hi,
On 1/2/21 7:42 AM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 1:16 PM Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
>> Attached is an updated version of the patch series, rebased on current
>> master, and results for benchmark comparing the various bloom variants.
>
> Perhaps src/include/utils/inet.h needs to in
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:00 AM Michail Nikolaev
wrote:
> Working on some stuff, I realized I do not understand why
> latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid (in different types of WAL records) are
> sent every time they appear on the primary side.
>
> latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid is used to call
> ResolveRec
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 06:22:43PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, I have done an extra effort on those fixes where needed. On top
> of that, I have included catalogs.sgml, pgstatstatements.sgml,
> explain.sgml, pg_verifybackup.sgml and wal.sgml in 13.
Justin, I got to look at the libxml2 pa
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 03:10:54PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 06:22:43PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yes, I have done an extra effort on those fixes where needed. On top
> > of that, I have included catalogs.sgml, pgstatstatements.sgml,
> > explain.sgml, pg_verif
17 matches
Mail list logo
