On 2025-Mar-26, Suraj Kharage wrote:
> Yes, I agree. As Peter said, it is now inline with other commands.
>
> I have reviewed the patch and it looks good to me.
Thanks for reviewing!
> Since we are removing the SET keyword, how about removing that from the
> below comment as well.
>
> /*
> *
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:32 PM Álvaro Herrera
wrote:
> With commit f4e53e10b6ce we introduced a way to flip the NO INHERIT bit
> on not-null constraints. However, because of the way the grammar
> dealt with ALTER CONSTRAINT, we were too blind to see a way to implement
> it using the existing pr
On 25.03.25 17:02, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
With commit f4e53e10b6ce we introduced a way to flip the NO INHERIT bit
on not-null constraints. However, because of the way the grammar
dealt with ALTER CONSTRAINT, we were too blind to see a way to implement
it using the existing production. It turns o
On 2025-Mar-25, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> With commit f4e53e10b6ce we introduced a way to flip the NO INHERIT bit
> on not-null constraints. However, because of the way the grammar
> dealt with ALTER CONSTRAINT, we were too blind to see a way to implement
> it using the existing production.
Patch
With commit f4e53e10b6ce we introduced a way to flip the NO INHERIT bit
on not-null constraints. However, because of the way the grammar
dealt with ALTER CONSTRAINT, we were too blind to see a way to implement
it using the existing production. It turns out that we can remove it,
so the commands w
