On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:34:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pushed after fiddling with the comments.
Thanks!
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Pavel Borisov writes:
> I see the proposed patch as uncontroversial and good enough to be
> committed. It will make the code a little clearer. Personally, I don't like
> leaving functions that are just wrappers for another and called only once.
Yeah, I like this for a different reason: just a cou
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 16:41, Maxim Orlov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In general I'm for this patch. Some time ago I was working on a patch
> related to shared memory and noticed
> no reason to have reset_shared() function.
>
Hi, hackers!
I see the proposed patch as uncontroversial and good enough to be
co
Hi!
In general I'm for this patch. Some time ago I was working on a patch
related to shared memory and noticed
no reason to have reset_shared() function.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:17:02PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> Is there any reason to keep reset_shared() around anymore? It is now just
> a wrapper function for CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores(), and AFAICT the
> information in the comments is already covered by comments i
so I don't intend to carry this patch further
if anyone is opposed.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>From 295e1e93a2ff4e655e85040d931c0d332d14b5bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:56:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] R
