Hi,
Le mercredi 27 septembre 2023 à 10:14 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit :
> Being a common format in ingestion tools makes it interesting though, but I
> wonder if those tools aren't alreday supporting CSV such that adding logfmt
> won't move the compatibility markers much?
Compared to CSV, lo
> On 26 Sep 2023, at 09:56, Étienne BERSAC wrote:
> Le mardi 05 septembre 2023 à 11:35 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit :
>>> On 30 Aug 2023, at 14:36, Étienne BERSAC wrote:
>>
>>> ..what do you think of having logfmt output along json and CSV ?
>>
>> Less ideal is
>> that there is no official
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the feedback.
Le mardi 05 septembre 2023 à 11:35 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit :
> > On 30 Aug 2023, at 14:36, Étienne BERSAC wrote:
>
> > ..what do you think of having logfmt output along json and CSV ?
>
> Less ideal is
> that there is no official formal definition o
> On 30 Aug 2023, at 14:36, Étienne BERSAC wrote:
> ..what do you think of having logfmt output along json and CSV ?
logfmt is widely supported by log ingestion and analysis tools, and have been
for a long enoug time (IMHO) to be called mature, which is good. Less ideal is
that there is no offi
Hi everyone,
I just release a logfmt log collector for PostgreSQL :
https://pgxn.org/dist/logfmt/1.0.0/ . This works quite well but I have
a few issues I would like to share with hackers.
First, what do you think of having logfmt output along json and CSV ?
PostgreSQL internal syslogger has built
