> On 30 Aug 2023, at 14:36, Étienne BERSAC <etienne.ber...@dalibo.com> wrote:
> ..what do you think of having logfmt output along json and CSV ? logfmt is widely supported by log ingestion and analysis tools, and have been for a long enoug time (IMHO) to be called mature, which is good. Less ideal is that there is no official formal definition of what logfmt is, some consumers of it (like Splunk) even support it while not calling it logfmt. If we add support for it, can we reasonably expect that what we emit is what consumers of it assume it will look like? Given the simplicity of it I think it can be argued, but I'm far from an expert in this area. -- Daniel Gustafsson
