On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:04 AM Anastasia Lubennikova
wrote:
>
> On 27.10.2020 13:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira
> >>> wrote:
> Hi,
On 27.10.2020 13:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira
wrote:
Hi,
While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a table
with a deferre
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a
>> > table
>> > with a deferred
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a
> table
> > with a deferred primary key is not updatable in logical replication.
> AFAICS it
> > ha
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a table
> with a deferred primary key is not updatable in logical replication. AFAICS it
> has been like that since the beginning of logical decoding and seems to
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Patch applies cleanly. Tested that update/delete of tables with defer
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 05:16, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> The patch no longer applies, because of additions in the test source.
> Otherwise, I have tested the patch and confirmed that updates and deletes
> on tables with deferred primary keys work with logical replication.
>
> The new status of this pa
The patch no longer applies, because of additions in the test source.
Otherwise, I have tested the patch and confirmed that updates and deletes on
tables with deferred primary keys work with logical replication.
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a
table
with a deferred primary key is not updatable in logical replication. AFAICS
it
has been like that since the beginning of logical decoding and seems to be
an
oversight while designing logical decoding. I don't envisio
