On 2018-01-02 23:34:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-01-02 23:08:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
> >> currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel
> >> syndrome by calling it "r
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-01-02 23:08:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
>> currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel
>> syndrome by calling it "rewind_copy_file_range". But I'm not that
>> happy with
Hi,
On 2018-01-02 23:08:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > something like rwnd_copy_file_range or such.
> Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
> currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's b
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like we'd better rename our function. Anybody have an idea
>> more creative than "pg_copy_file_range"?
> I'd rather name it pg_rewind specific,
OK ...
> something like
> rwnd_copy_file_range or such.
Bleah --- "rwn
Hi,
On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Buildfarm member caiman just came back online after some time AWOL, and
> it's not happy. The problem evidently is that pg_rewind's copy_file_range
> function conflicts with a recently added Linux system call:
>
> http://man7.org/linux/man-page
Buildfarm member caiman just came back online after some time AWOL, and
it's not happy. The problem evidently is that pg_rewind's copy_file_range
function conflicts with a recently added Linux system call:
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/copy_file_range.2.html
Looks like we'd better rename
