Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Looks like we'd better rename our function. Anybody have an idea >> more creative than "pg_copy_file_range"?
> I'd rather name it pg_rewind specific, OK ... > something like > rwnd_copy_file_range or such. Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel syndrome by calling it "rewind_copy_file_range". But I'm not that happy with any of these. Filipe Rosset pointed out to me off-list that we're not the only ones feeling the pain: https://sourceforge.net/p/e2fsprogs/code/ci/01551bdba16ab16512a01affe02ade32c41ede8a Maybe go with copy_file_chunk like e2fsprogs did? regards, tom lane
