Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures

2021-04-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" writes: >> +1 for updating the description though.  We could s/function/routine/ >> where space is tight. > Thanks for your inputs. Attached a proposal which updates the description. I changed config.sgml's description similarly, and pushed this.

Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures

2021-04-10 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>> It's possible the parameter name also appears in documentation for >> out-of-tree PLs, as each PL's validator function determines what >> "check_function_bodies" really means in that setting. >That parameter is also set explicitly in pg_dump output, so we >can't rename it without breaking exist

Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures

2021-04-09 Thread Tom Lane
Chapman Flack writes: > On 04/09/21 08:11, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: >> At least the description should mention procedures. >> Even the parameter name seems not to be correct anymore. Thoughts? > It's possible the parameter name also appears in documentation for > out-of-tree PLs, as each PL

Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures

2021-04-09 Thread Chapman Flack
On 04/09/21 08:11, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > At least the description should mention procedures. > Even the parameter name seems not to be correct anymore. Thoughts? It's possible the parameter name also appears in documentation for out-of-tree PLs, as each PL's validator function determine

check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures

2021-04-09 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Hi, check_function_bodies has this description: postgres=# select short_desc from pg_settings where name = 'check_function_bodies'; short_desc --- Check function bodies during CREATE FUNCTION. (1 row) This is not