On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:40:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > OK, I used some of your ideas and tried for something more general;
> > > patch attached.
> >
> > I think it's a good idea to mention custom
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:19:48PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, I used some of your ideas and tried for something more general;
> > patch attached.
>
> This is good.
>
> But I wonder if "dropped before upgrading" is too spec
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > OK, I used some of your ideas and tried for something more general;
> > patch attached.
>
> I think it's a good idea to mention custom aggregates and operators
> specifically, as otherwise people will look at t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I used some of your ideas and tried for something more general;
> patch attached.
This is good.
But I wonder if "dropped before upgrading" is too specific to pg_upgrade?
Dropping the aggregate before starting a backup to be re
Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, I used some of your ideas and tried for something more general;
> patch attached.
I think it's a good idea to mention custom aggregates and operators
specifically, as otherwise people will look at this and have little
idea what you're on about. I just want wording li
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:56:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > OK, I came up with the attached patch. This is one of the few cases
> > where the incompatibility is not clearly related to the feature, so I
> > left the existing item alone and just created a new one with the
Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, I came up with the attached patch. This is one of the few cases
> where the incompatibility is not clearly related to the feature, so I
> left the existing item alone and just created a new one with the same
> commit message in the incompatibilities section.
I think p
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 07:10:00PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:02:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This involves creating an aggreate that _uses_ these array functions as
> > their state transition function?
>
> Yes
OK, I came up with the attached patch. This is
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:02:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This involves creating an aggreate that _uses_ these array functions as
> their state transition function?
Yes
--
Justin
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> @Bruce: Would you add something about this to the release notes before beta2?
>
> I added it as an OpenItem.
OK, see below.
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:35:10PM -04
@Bruce: Would you add something about this to the release notes before beta2?
I added it as an OpenItem.
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:35:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Justin Pryzby writes:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:43:51PM -
11 matches
Mail list logo
