On Tue, Jun  8, 2021 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> @Bruce: Would you add something about this to the release notes before beta2?
> 
> I added it as an OpenItem.

OK, see below.

> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:35:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> writes:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:43:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> As was discussed in the thread leading up to that commit, modifying the
> > > >> signature of array_cat and friends could break user-defined operators
> > > >> and aggregates based on those functions.  It seems to me that the
> > > >> usability gain from this change is worth that cost, but it is causing
> > > >> an issue for xversion tests.

Uh, this is _using_ these functions in aggregates, or changing the
system functions' argument types, right?  I didn't think we supported
dump/restore of modified system tables.

> > > 
> > > > But I think this should be called out as an incompatible change in the 
> > > > release
> > > > notes.
> > > 
> > > If it was not, yes it should be.
> > 
> > @Bruce, I propose:
> > 
> > Some system functions are changed to accept "anycompatiblearray" arguments.
> > This causes failures when restoring a database backup or running pg_restore 
> > if
> > there were aggregate functions defined using those functions with their
> > original argument types.
> > 
> > Such aggregate functions should be dropped before upgrade/restore and then
> > re-created afterwards using the "anycompatible" functions.  The affected
> > functions are: array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position,
> > array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket.

I read the entire thread and I see:

        pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR:  function
                array_append(anyarray, anyelement) does not exist
        Command was: CREATE AGGREGATE public.array_accum(anyelement) (
            SFUNC = array_append,
            STYPE = anyarray,
            INITCOND = '{}',
            PARALLEL = safe
        );

This involves creating an aggreate that _uses_ these array functions as
their state transition function?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.



Reply via email to