On 19 December 2017 at 23:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > I also think it is good to allow ParallelWorkerNumber to be used in
> > extensions. Attached is the patch for same. I think for other two we
> > should wait till there is really a good
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I also think it is good to allow ParallelWorkerNumber to be used in
> extensions. Attached is the patch for same. I think for other two we
> should wait till there is really a good use case for them.
I think waiting for a "really good" use c
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> I suppose that extensions are supposed to be allowed to use the
>> facilities in access/parallel.h. I noticed in passing when I wrote a
>> throwaway test harness that my Windows built
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> I suppose that extensions are supposed to be allowed to use the
> facilities in access/parallel.h. I noticed in passing when I wrote a
> throwaway test harness that my Windows built drone complained:
>
> test_sharedtuplestore.obj : error LNK2
Hi hackers,
I suppose that extensions are supposed to be allowed to use the
facilities in access/parallel.h. I noticed in passing when I wrote a
throwaway test harness that my Windows built drone complained:
test_sharedtuplestore.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
ParallelWorkerNumb
