On 19 December 2017 at 23:24, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I also think it is good to allow ParallelWorkerNumber to be used in > > extensions. Attached is the patch for same. I think for other two we > > should wait till there is really a good use case for them. > > I think waiting for a "really good" use case is too high a bar. I > think we only need to think that there is a "reasonable" use case. > Accordingly, I pushed a commit adding PGDLLIMPORT to both > ParallelWorkerNumber and InitializingParallelWorker. > Especially since all non-static *functions* are exported unconditionally, so it's not like we set a high bar for public API. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
