Re: Typo in JIT documentation

2018-04-26 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Hmm, I thought we talked about changing such references to say 'JIT > compilation' rather than just 'JIT'. Perhaps. I recall that this has been mentioned already the last couple of weeks on the JIT thread. Personally, I can see that

Re: Typo in JIT documentation

2018-04-26 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I just found $subject: >> the server was compiled without --with-llvm), >> -JIT will not performed, even if considered to be >> +JIT will not be per

Re: Typo in JIT documentation

2018-04-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Hi all, > > I just found $subject: > the server was compiled without --with-llvm), > -JIT will not performed, even if considered to be > +JIT will not be performed, even if considered to be > beneficial based on the above

Typo in JIT documentation

2018-04-24 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, I just found $subject: the server was compiled without --with-llvm), -JIT will not performed, even if considered to be +JIT will not be performed, even if considered to be beneficial based on the above criteria. Setting Thanks, -- Michael diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/jit.