On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Hmm, I thought we talked about changing such references to say 'JIT > compilation' rather than just 'JIT'.
Perhaps. I recall that this has been mentioned already the last couple of weeks on the JIT thread. Personally, I can see that JIT is listed as an acronym in the docs with its meaning explained by a link to wikipedia about just-in-time compilation, so I am fine with the use of the acronym. "JIT" is actually used without the <acronym> markup in config.sgml. I think that at least this part should be fixed. At the end that would be mainly Andres' call? Do you think that an open item would be adapted? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
