Thomas Munro writes:
> In fact only REL_10_STABLE had the problem, because commit 2cf8c7aa
> already fixed the other instance in later branches. I'd entirely
> forgotten that earlier discussion, which apparently didn't quite go
> far enough. So I only needed to push the with.sql change. Done.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:27 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks reasonable. We really should avoid using such common
> names for short-lived tables in any case --- it's an invitation
> to trouble. So I'd vote for changing the other use of "test", too.
In fact only REL_10_STABLE had the problem, because
Thomas Munro writes:
> With unlucky scheduling you can get a failure like this:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hoverfly&dt=2021-12-22%2010%3A51%3A32
> Suggested fix attached.
Looks reasonable. We really should avoid using such common
names for short-lived tables in any
Hi,
With unlucky scheduling you can get a failure like this:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hoverfly&dt=2021-12-22%2010%3A51%3A32
Suggested fix attached.
From 3991f040e9c9afc4d7cfd4980b5f27f4113dbd1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Munro
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 14: