Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > In fact only REL_10_STABLE had the problem, because commit 2cf8c7aa > already fixed the other instance in later branches. I'd entirely > forgotten that earlier discussion, which apparently didn't quite go > far enough. So I only needed to push the with.sql change. Done.
Hah, I thought this felt familiar. So the real problem is that
my backpatch (b15a8c963) only fixed half of the hazard. Sigh.
regards, tom lane
