On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 2:35 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I can confirm that the attached program works on cfarm111 (AIX 7.1)
> and cfarm119 (AIX 7.3), though "man realpath" denies it on both
> systems.
Another example of this phenomenon: they have nl_langinfo_l(), a POSIX
2008 feature we want in a nearb
I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> Tom had tested this on and found that it does actually work on AIX 7.1
>> and 7.3 but the documentation is wrong.
> I too have a distinct recollection of having tested this (using the
> gcc compile farm machines), but I cannot find anything saying so in
> t
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 12.08.24 08:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I checked this in the AIX 7.3 manual and the POSIX 2008 way does not
>> appear to be mentioned there:
>> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.3?topic=r-realpath-subroutine
> Tom had tested this on and found that it does actually wo
On 12.08.24 08:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 05.08.24 09:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/08/2024 09:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The now preferred way to call realpath() is by passing NULL as the
second argument and get a malloc'ed resul
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 05.08.24 09:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 05/08/2024 09:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> The now preferred way to call realpath() is by passing NULL as the
> >> second argument and get a malloc'ed result. We still supported the
>
On 05.08.24 09:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/08/2024 09:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The now preferred way to call realpath() is by passing NULL as the
second argument and get a malloc'ed result. We still supported the
old way of providing our own buffer as a second argument, for some
plat
> On 6 Aug 2024, at 07:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am dubious that it is a good idea to remove
> this code knowing that we have a thread from a few months ago about
> the fact that we have folks complaining about AIX support and that we
> should bring it back:
According to upthread it is supp
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 10:08:04AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> We don't seem to have any mentions of POSIX or SuS in docs, in the
>> installation sections. There are a few mentions of POSIX-1.2008 and
>> POSIX-1.2001 it in the commit log, though, where we require featu
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> We don't seem to have any mentions of POSIX or SuS in docs, in the
> installation sections. There are a few mentions of POSIX-1.2008 and
> POSIX-1.2001 it in the commit log, though, where we require features
> specified by those. Can we rely on everything from POSIX
On 05/08/2024 09:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The now preferred way to call realpath() is by passing NULL as the
second argument and get a malloc'ed result. We still supported the
old way of providing our own buffer as a second argument, for some
platforms that didn't support the new way yet. Th
07:50:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove support for old realpath() API
The now preferred way to call realpath() is by passing NULL as the
second argument and get a malloc'ed result. We still supported the
old way of providing our own buffer as a second argument, for some
platforms that didn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
