On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:41 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/04/06 13:57, vignesh C wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While reviewing replication statistics I found a small typo. Attached
> > patch for a typo in:
> > src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
>
> Thanks for the report and patch! Pushed.
>
Thanks
On 2021/04/06 13:57, vignesh C wrote:
Hi,
While reviewing replication statistics I found a small typo. Attached
patch for a typo in:
src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
Thanks for the report and patch! Pushed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Developme
On 2018/11/20 15:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:00:39PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> - * We also use EquivalenceClasses as the base structure for PathKeys,
>>> letting
>>> + * We also use EquivalenceClass as the base structure for PathKeys, letting
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:58:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason that's not good is that it creates a singular-plural mismatch.
> If you'd also changed "PathKeys" to "PathKey", it would still read OK,
> though I don't think it's an improvement particularly.
>
> (Hm ... though arguably, "stru
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:00:39PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> - * We also use EquivalenceClasses as the base structure for PathKeys,
>> letting
>> + * We also use EquivalenceClass as the base structure for PathKeys, letting
> ... But not that.
The reason that's not
Thank you for looking.
On 2018/11/20 14:13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:00:39PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> It seems to me that EquivalenceClass, the struct/type name, has been
>> misspelled as 'EquivalenceClasses' a couple of times in the comment above
>> its definition.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:00:39PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> It seems to me that EquivalenceClass, the struct/type name, has been
> misspelled as 'EquivalenceClasses' a couple of times in the comment above
> its definition.
EquivalenceClasses stands for the plural of EquivalenceClass. So
think