On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
>
> Thanks. There are functions like try_partition_wise_join(),
> generate_partition_wise_join_paths() which use partition_wise
> spelling. Should we update those as well?
I see that the commit already did that. Sorry. Although, I would have
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to
On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
>>> would write it enable_partiti
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>
> +1
>
> See also: https://postgr.
On 14/02/18 09:27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
Thoughts?
As 'wise' is a suffix, not a word in this situation - so it be combine
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
+1
See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql
--
Álvaro Her
