On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> >> wrote: >>> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of >>>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I >>>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql >> >> To that I replied with >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com. >> I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time. >> Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and >> Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it. > > done
Thanks. There are functions like try_partition_wise_join(), generate_partition_wise_join_paths() which use partition_wise spelling. Should we update those as well? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
