On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:12:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Where are we on this? Can the functions be removed in PG 14?
(Sent this message previously but it got lost after some cross-posting
across two lists, issue fixed now.)
I still have a patch lying around to do that, registered in the
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 05:24:12PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:44 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Yeah, if we could simplify the tableam API, that would be sufficient
> > > reason to remove the stuff in v12
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:44 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, if we could simplify the tableam API, that would be sufficient
> > reason to remove the stuff in v12, IMO. But if it is outside of that
> > API, I'd counsel waiting till
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, if we could simplify the tableam API, that would be sufficient
> reason to remove the stuff in v12, IMO. But if it is outside of that
> API, I'd counsel waiting till v13.
Yes, I agree that simplifying the table AM interface would b
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-04-11 13:27:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think removing it after feature freeze is not something to do,
>> but +1 for nuking it as soon as the v13 branch opens. Unless
>> there's some important reason we need it to be gone in v12?
> No, I don't think there reall
Hi,
On 2019-04-11 13:52:08 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> As I understand, this setLastTid stuff would cause trouble if used
> with a non-core table AM.
I'm not sure there'd actually be trouble. I mean, what it does for heap
is basically meaningless already, so it's not going to be meaningfully
w
On 2019-Apr-11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-03-27 10:01:08 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> >> The above code remains only for PG servers whose version < 8.2.
> >> Please remove the code around setLastTid().
>
> > Does anybody else have concerns about removing this interfac
Hi,
On 2019-04-11 13:27:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-03-27 10:01:08 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> >> The above code remains only for PG servers whose version < 8.2.
> >> Please remove the code around setLastTid().
>
> > Does anybody else have concerns about remo
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-03-27 10:01:08 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>> The above code remains only for PG servers whose version < 8.2.
>> Please remove the code around setLastTid().
> Does anybody else have concerns about removing this interface? Does
> anybody think we should have a depr
Hi,
On 2019-03-27 10:01:08 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> Hi Andres,
> Sorry for the late reply.
Not late at all. Sorry for *my* late reply :)
> On 2019/03/26 9:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the tableam work I'd like to remove heapam.h from
> > nodeModifyTable.c. The only remain
Hi Andres,
Sorry for the late reply.
On 2019/03/26 9:44, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
For the tableam work I'd like to remove heapam.h from
nodeModifyTable.c. The only remaining impediment to that is a call to
setLastTid(), which is defined in tid.c but declared in heapam.h.
That doesn't seem like
11 matches
Mail list logo
