>>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
>>
>>> Personally, I don't find this hint particularly necessary. The
>>> session was terminated because nothing was happening, so the real fix
>>> on the application side is probably more involved than just retrying.
>>> This is different from some
>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
>
>> Personally, I don't find this hint particularly necessary. The
>> session was terminated because nothing was happening, so the real fix
>> on the application side is probably more involved than just retrying.
>> This is different from some of th
> Personally, I don't find this hint particularly necessary. The session
> was terminated because nothing was happening, so the real fix on the
> application side is probably more involved than just retrying. This is
> different from some of the other cases that were cited, such as
> serializatio
On 2018-11-28 04:17, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> + errmsg("terminating connection due to
> idle-in-transaction timeout"),
> + errhint("In a moment you should be
> able to reconnect to the"
> +
Hi,
On Monday, February 4, 2019 2:15 AM +, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:07:34AM +, Ideriha, Takeshi wrote:
> > Sure. I didn't have a strong opinion about it, so it's ok.
> From what I can see this is waiting input from a native English speaker, so
> for now I have
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:07:34AM +, Ideriha, Takeshi wrote:
> Sure. I didn't have a strong opinion about it, so it's ok.
From what I can see this is waiting input from a native English
speaker, so for now I have moved this entry to next CF.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
>Subject: Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
>
>>>>>>Alternative HINT message would be something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>HINT: In a moment you should be able to rec
>Alternative HINT message would be something like:
>
>HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
> database and restart your transaction.
>
>This could make the meaning of the error (transaction aborted)
>cleaner and might give a better suggestion to t
>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
>
>Hi Ideriha-san,
>
> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
> other cases you mentioned.
>
> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
> psql the output would become the follow
Hi,
> Hello.
>
> At Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:16:01 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii
> wrote in <20181129.091601.830026250066724330.t-is...@sraoss.co.jp>
>> >>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
>> >>> other cases you mentioned.
>> >>>
>> >>> I didn't attach the patch but ac
Hello.
At Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:16:01 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii
wrote in <20181129.091601.830026250066724330.t-is...@sraoss.co.jp>
> >>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
> >>> other cases you mentioned.
> >>>
> >>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my sim
Hi Ideriha-san,
Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
other cases you mentioned.
I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
psql the output would become the following:
FATAL: terminating connection due to idle
>>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
>>> other cases you mentioned.
>>>
>>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
>>> psql the output would become the following:
>>>
>>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout
>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
>> other cases you mentioned.
>>
>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
>> psql the output would become the following:
>>
>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout
>> HINT
> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as other cases
> you mentioned.
>
> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment
> in psql the output would become the following:
>
> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout
> HINT: In
>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 12:18 PM
>To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
>Subject: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
>
>idle-in-transaction timeout error closed the session. I think in this case the
>error
>message sh
16 matches
Mail list logo
