On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 04:30:07PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> I've attached a small word diff to suggest a few different words to use
> in the README, if that sounds better?
Sounds good to me. So applied with those changes. It is really
tempting to add an example of validator (one simple thing wo
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:25:52PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 01:01:10PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> > Ah, right. For the moment I've added some empty conditionals for
> > trigger and event trigger handling.
> >
> > I've created a new entry in the commitfest app. [1] I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 01:01:10PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> Ah, right. For the moment I've added some empty conditionals for
> trigger and event trigger handling.
>
> I've created a new entry in the commitfest app. [1] I'll keep at it. :)
Thanks for the patch. I have reviewed and reworked it
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:47:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:45:17PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> > Sounds good to me. Something more like the attached patch?
>
> That's the idea. I have not gone in details into what you have here,
> but perhaps it would make sense
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:45:17PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Something more like the attached patch?
That's the idea. I have not gone in details into what you have here,
but perhaps it would make sense to do a bit more and show how things
are done in the context of a PL functi
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 01:19:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:13:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > On second thought, contrib/ is not quite the right place, because we
> > typically expect modules there to actually get installed, meaning they
> > have to have at least
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:13:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On second thought, contrib/ is not quite the right place, because we
> typically expect modules there to actually get installed, meaning they
> have to have at least some end-user usefulness. The right place for
> a toy PL handler is prob
Mark Wong writes:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:10:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder if it'd be possible to adapt what you have here into some
>> tiny contrib module that doesn't do very much useful, but can at
>> least be tested to see that it compiles; moreover it could be
>> copied verbati
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:10:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong writes:
> > Would some additional procedure language handler code examples in the
> > documentation be good to add? I've put some together in the attached
> > patch, and can log it to a future commitfest if people think it woul
Mark Wong writes:
> Would some additional procedure language handler code examples in the
> documentation be good to add? I've put some together in the attached
> patch, and can log it to a future commitfest if people think it would
> be a good addition.
Hmm. The existing doc examples are reall
10 matches
Mail list logo
