On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:45:17PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote: > Sounds good to me. Something more like the attached patch?
That's the idea. I have not gone in details into what you have here, but perhaps it would make sense to do a bit more and show how things are done in the context of a PL function called in a trigger? Your patch removes from the docs a code block that outlined that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
