Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-11-23 Thread Amit Kapila
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:04 AM Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > > On 27.10.2020 13:46, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira > > wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira > >>> wrote: > Hi,

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-11-23 Thread Anastasia Lubennikova
On 27.10.2020 13:46, Amit Kapila wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira wrote: Hi, While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a table with a deferre

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-10-27 Thread Amit Kapila
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:39 PM Euler Taveira wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a >> > table >> > with a deferred

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-10-25 Thread Euler Taveira
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 08:34, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a > table > > with a deferred primary key is not updatable in logical replication. > AFAICS it > > ha

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-10-05 Thread Amit Kapila
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:41 AM Euler Taveira wrote: > > Hi, > > While looking at an old wal2json issue, I stumbled on a scenario that a table > with a deferred primary key is not updatable in logical replication. AFAICS it > has been like that since the beginning of logical decoding and seems to

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-08-03 Thread Ajin Cherian
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:not tested Patch applies cleanly. Tested that update/delete of tables with defer

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-07-27 Thread Euler Taveira
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 05:16, Ajin Cherian wrote: > The patch no longer applies, because of additions in the test source. > Otherwise, I have tested the patch and confirmed that updates and deletes > on tables with deferred primary keys work with logical replication. > > The new status of this pa

Re: deferred primary key and logical replication

2020-07-24 Thread Ajin Cherian
The patch no longer applies, because of additions in the test source. Otherwise, I have tested the patch and confirmed that updates and deletes on tables with deferred primary keys work with logical replication. The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author