On 09/01/2019 09:20, Mi Tar wrote:
> I tested this patch and it applied cleanly and all tests passed. I haven't
> looked if the changes to tests are reasonable or extensive to cover all
> aspects of what they want to cover.
I have committed this with additional tests for partitioned tables, as
r
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Hi!
I tested this patch and it applied cleanly and all tests passed. I h
On 2018-Dec-07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 14:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hmm. One of the things I did for FKs on partitioned tables was remove
> > all the cases involving only unpartitioned tables, then run just the
> > foreign_key test and see what the coverage looked like -- in
On 04/12/2018 14:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> During the development of my recent patch "unused/redundant foreign key
>> code" [0], I had developed a few additional test cases to increase the
>> coverage in ri_triggers.c. They are in the attached patche
On 2018-Dec-04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> During the development of my recent patch "unused/redundant foreign key
> code" [0], I had developed a few additional test cases to increase the
> coverage in ri_triggers.c. They are in the attached patches with
> explanations. With these, coverage shoul
