On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:55 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Um ... you seem to have removed some useful comments?
I don't think that the stuff about making them into a GUC is useful myself.
> Personally I wouldn't do this, as I don't think the renaming
> brings much benefit, and it will create a hazard fo
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> I propose to rename some of the rel truncation related constants at
> the top of vacuumlazy.c, per the attached patch. The patch
> consolidates related constants into a single block/grouping, and
> imposes a uniform naming scheme.
Um ... you seem to have removed some use
