On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:26 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> The attached v5 version has the change to create subscriptions in
> streaming off mode. I also did not find any other TAP test which
> required further changes.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:17 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:40 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached v3 version patch has a caution added for the same.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, the patch looks good to me and I am
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh, here are some review comments for the patch v5-0001 (docs only).
>
> ==
> Commit message
>
> 1.
> The commit message only refers to this as the "streaming option", but
> an option of what? Somewhere we should mention this is an
Hi Vignesh, here are some review comments for the patch v5-0001 (docs only).
==
Commit message
1.
The commit message only refers to this as the "streaming option", but
an option of what? Somewhere we should mention this is an option of
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION.
~
2.
Previously the default value
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:17 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:40 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > Attached v3 version patch has a caution added for the same.
> >
>
> Thanks, the patch looks good to me and I am planning to commit this
> early next week unless there are objections or
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 16:24, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Amit, Vignesh,
>
> > 1. Please ensure that none of the existing tests that use
> > subscriptions with large changes will be impacted due to this change.
>
> I found at least 022_twophase_cascade.pl should be fixed.
> The file ha
Dear Amit, Vignesh,
> 1. Please ensure that none of the existing tests that use
> subscriptions with large changes will be impacted due to this change.
I found at least 022_twophase_cascade.pl should be fixed.
The file has a part which tests non-streaming case:
```
# ---
# 2P
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:40 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> Attached v3 version patch has a caution added for the same.
>
Thanks, the patch looks good to me and I am planning to commit this
early next week unless there are objections or any major problems. I
have slightly updated the docs and commit mes
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 14:36, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:05 AM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > The tests demonstrate a significant performance improvement when using
> > the parallel streaming option, insert shows 40-48 %improvement, delete
> > shows 34-39 %improvement, update show
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 12:26, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > One comment for your patch;
> > > Shouldn't we add a streaming=off case for pg_dump test? You added lines
> >
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:05 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> The tests demonstrate a significant performance improvement when using
> the parallel streaming option, insert shows 40-48 %improvement, delete
> shows 34-39 %improvement, update shows 26-30 %improvement. In the case
> of rollback the improvemen
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 12:26, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
>
> > One comment for your patch;
> > Shouldn't we add a streaming=off case for pg_dump test? You added lines but
> > no one
> > passes it.
> >
>
> Update existing pg_dump tests to c
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 5:24 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 9:48 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 9:48 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
>> > >
>> >
>> > With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> >
> > With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
> > increase the default for 'max_logical_replicatio
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> >
> > With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
> > increase the default for 'max_logical_replication
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 11:05, vignesh C wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> By default, currently streaming of in-progress transactions for
> subscriptions is disabled. All transactions are fully decoded on the
> publisher before being sent to the subscriber. This approach can lead
> to increased latency and reduce
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
>
> With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
> increase the default for 'max_logical_replication_workers' as IIUC
> parallel workers are taken from the same pool.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
increase the default for 'max_logical_replication_workers' as IIUC
parallel workers are taken from the same pool.
thanks
Shveta
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 12:26, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Vignesh,
>
> > One key point to consider is that the lock on transaction objects will
> > be held for a longer duration when using streaming in parallel. This
> > occurs because the parallel apply worker initiates the transaction
Dear Vignesh,
> One key point to consider is that the lock on transaction objects will
> be held for a longer duration when using streaming in parallel. This
> occurs because the parallel apply worker initiates the transaction as
> soon as streaming begins, maintaining the lock until the transacti
21 matches
Mail list logo