On 4/6/19 3:18 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Given nothing happened since then I think we ought to mark this as
returned with feedback? Will do so tomorrow.
Agreed, marked as Returned with Feedback.
Regards,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
Hi,
On 2019-03-21 22:06:36 +0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 2/15/19 11:59 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 14/02/2019 20:13, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2019-02-04 11:02:44 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > +1. I have just looked at the patch, and my take is that listing all
> > > > the wa
Hi Andreas,
On 2/15/19 11:59 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 14/02/2019 20:13, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2019-02-04 11:02:44 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
+1. I have just looked at the patch, and my take is that listing all
the ways to build Postgres directly in the README is just a
duplication
On 14/02/2019 20:13, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-02-04 11:02:44 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> +1. I have just looked at the patch, and my take is that listing all
>> the ways to build Postgres directly in the README is just a
>> duplication of what we already have in the documentation. So I
Hi,
On 2019-02-04 11:02:44 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +1. I have just looked at the patch, and my take is that listing all
> the ways to build Postgres directly in the README is just a
> duplication of what we already have in the documentation. So I would
> just rip out all that and keep a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:21:03PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm not in favor of listing all these versions here. It's one more
> thing to keep updated. The version requirements are not outrageous, so
> we can assume that someone with a reasonably up-to-date development
> machine has appro
On 03/11/2018 00:14, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> GNU make, version 3.8 or newer
> ISO/ANSI C compilar (at least C99-compliant)
> Flex 2.5.31 or later, and Bison 1.875 or later (for building from git)
> Perl 5.8.3 (for building from git)
I'm not in favor of listing all these versions here. It
On 03.11.18 18:06, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
On 02.11.18 01:38, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
How about the attached one? Picked up your draft, and cleaned it up a bit.
(unsurprisingly) this is looki
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
> On 02.11.18 01:38, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
> >>How about the attached one? Picked up your draft, and cleaned it up a bit.
> >(unsurprisingly) this is looking pretty good to me.
> >
> >A few
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:47:19AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> As for what's in the README on the master branch, I was saying that it
> *should* point to the development documentation, since that should be
> current with whatever is actually in the git repo (or only a day behind
> or such).
Defi
On 02.11.18 01:38, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
How about the attached one? Picked up your draft, and cleaned it up a bit.
(unsurprisingly) this is looking pretty good to me.
A few additional notes:
Incorporated. See the attached.
If that
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:42:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > If we go down this route, the master branch should probably link to the
> > regularly built devel documentation, so that if/when we do make such a
> > change, we'll point
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:42:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> If we go down this route, the master branch should probably link to the
> regularly built devel documentation, so that if/when we do make such a
> change, we'll point people at the updated documentation too.
I don't know how others f
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:41:33PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'm not sure that I'm really following this, because we aren't pointing
> > to the development documentation, just the 'current' documentation, and
> > that seems fine, an
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
> How about the attached one? Picked up your draft, and cleaned it up a bit.
(unsurprisingly) this is looking pretty good to me.
A few additional notes:
> PostgreSQL Database Management System
> =
>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:41:33PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm not sure that I'm really following this, because we aren't pointing
> to the development documentation, just the 'current' documentation, and
> that seems fine, and there's links on that page to the other versions of
> the page fo
On 01.11.18 18:41, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
On 01.11.18 07:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
It includes links to the website, as well as the short version of the
installation instructions.
+The installation instructions are listed on the websit
Greetings,
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
> On 01.11.18 07:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>It includes links to the website, as well as the short version of the
> >>installation instructions.
> >+The installation instructions are listed on the website:
> >+
> >+https://www.postgres
On 01.11.18 07:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:32:09AM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Picking up on this idea, attached is a first draft for changing the
README.
Why don't you add it to the upcoming commit fest? It would be good to
get some traction with a formal r
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:32:09AM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> Picking up on this idea, attached is a first draft for changing the
> README.
Why don't you add it to the upcoming commit fest? It would be good to
get some traction with a formal review.
> It includes links to the websit
On 01.11.18 01:29, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:30:40AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Agreed, we should really improve the README by merging the README.git
into it and make the project, as a whole, more accessible to new
developers.
+1. I think as well that this approach wou
Hi,
On 2018-11-01 09:29:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:30:40AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Agreed, we should really improve the README by merging the README.git
> > into it and make the project, as a whole, more accessible to new
> > developers.
>
> +1. I think
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:30:40AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Agreed, we should really improve the README by merging the README.git
> into it and make the project, as a whole, more accessible to new
> developers.
+1. I think as well that this approach would be a good thing.
--
Michael
signat
* Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum (a...@pgug.de) wrote:
> On 30.10.18 11:49, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >On 10/30/2018 06:14 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> >>On 30.10.18 04:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>>FWIW, I think that people depend too much on github and what github
> >>>thinks projects should do
On 30.10.18 11:49, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 10/30/2018 06:14 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
On 30.10.18 04:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
wrote:
That is not the first file people looking at. Especially not people
looking
at t
On 10/30/2018 06:14 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
On 30.10.18 04:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
That is not the first file people looking at. Especially not people
looking
at the GitHub copy:
https://github.com/postg
On 30.10.18 04:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
That is not the first file people looking at. Especially not people looking
at the GitHub copy:
https://github.com/postgres/postgres
I understand that there is documentation, but
>
> > That is not the first file people looking at. Especially not people
> looking
> > at the GitHub copy:
> >
> > https://github.com/postgres/postgres
> >
> > I understand that there is documentation, but for the casual developer
> > looking at this, it seems broken.
>
> FWIW, I think that people
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> That is not the first file people looking at. Especially not people looking
> at the GitHub copy:
>
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres
>
> I understand that there is documentation, but for the casual developer
> looking
On 28.10.18 20:39, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 10/28/2018 08:13 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Hello,
while working with Google Code-In students, there is one task: "clone
PostgreSQL from git repository, and build from source".
This brought up an interesting problem: the README refers to
On 10/28/2018 08:13 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Hello,
while working with Google Code-In students, there is one task: "clone
PostgreSQL from git repository, and build from source".
This brought up an interesting problem: the README refers to an
"INSTALL" file, which is present in
31 matches
Mail list logo
