On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:42:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > If we go down this route, the master branch should probably link to the > regularly built devel documentation, so that if/when we do make such a > change, we'll point people at the updated documentation too.
I don't know how others feel about such things, so I may be overengineering a simple problem as well :) Also, I have not looked in details at the perl tools used to change the version number in the tree, but we'd likely want a solution which updates automatically the README also in this case depending on the version number, perhaps also making sure that for a git repository with the master branch in use we don't want to point to the development version of the docs. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
