Hi,
On 2023-11-09 11:50:10 +, Zakhlystov, Daniil (Nebius) wrote:
> > On 9 Nov 2023, at 01:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > I am not really convinced that this is worth complicating the skipped
> > path for this goal. In my experience, I've seen complaints where WAL
> > archiving bloat was
Hello,
> On 9 Nov 2023, at 01:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> I am not really convinced that this is worth complicating the skipped
> path for this goal. In my experience, I've seen complaints where WAL
> archiving bloat was coming from the archive command not able to keep
> up with the amount g
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 12:44:09PM +, Zakhlystov, Daniil (Nebius) wrote:
>> I am not sure to understand your last sentence here. Once the
>> archiver is back up, you mean that the WAL segments that were not
>> previously archived still are still not archived? Or do you mean that
>> because of
Hi!
Thanks for your review.
> I am not sure to understand your last sentence here. Once the
> archiver is back up, you mean that the WAL segments that were not
> previously archived still are still not archived? Or do you mean that
> because of a succession of checkpoint skipped we are just ena
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:09:21PM +, Zakhlystov, Daniil (Nebius) wrote:
> I've stumbled into an interesting problem. Currently, if Postgres
> has nothing to write, it would skip the checkpoint creation defined
> by the checkpoint timeout setting. However, we might face a
> temporary archiving
ce the old transactions logs cleanup even if checkpoint is
skipped
CAUTION: This email originated from outside mail organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
Hi,
I went through the Cfbot and saw that some test are failing for it
(link: https://cirrus-c
Hi,
I went through the Cfbot and saw that some test are failing for it
(link: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4631357628874752):
test: postgresql:recovery / recovery/019_replslot_limit
# test failed
--- stderr ---
# poll_query_un
