Re: [PATCH] Conflation of member/privs for predefined roles

2021-10-27 Thread Joshua Brindle
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:34 PM Bossart, Nathan wrote: > > On 10/27/21, 10:28 AM, "Joshua Brindle" > wrote: > > I'm new to contributing here but I've been told that the string > > changes get taken care of later, is that not true? > > I will sometimes leave out tests and docs until I get buy-in

Re: [PATCH] Conflation of member/privs for predefined roles

2021-10-27 Thread Bossart, Nathan
On 10/27/21, 10:28 AM, "Joshua Brindle" wrote: > I'm new to contributing here but I've been told that the string > changes get taken care of later, is that not true? I will sometimes leave out tests and docs until I get buy-in on the approach. But for serious consideration, I think the patch has

Re: [PATCH] Conflation of member/privs for predefined roles

2021-10-27 Thread Joshua Brindle
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:20 PM Bossart, Nathan wrote: > > On 10/26/21, 3:50 PM, "Joshua Brindle" wrote: > > Generally if a role is granted membership to another role with NOINHERIT > > they must use SET ROLE to access the privileges of that role, however > > with predefined roles the membership

Re: [PATCH] Conflation of member/privs for predefined roles

2021-10-27 Thread Bossart, Nathan
On 10/26/21, 3:50 PM, "Joshua Brindle" wrote: > Generally if a role is granted membership to another role with NOINHERIT > they must use SET ROLE to access the privileges of that role, however > with predefined roles the membership and privilege is conflated, as > demonstrated by: I think it make