On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:24 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:11 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> > Anyway, I'll think a bit more about the possible hazards of not doing
> > the locking and will reply again if there's indeed a problem(s) that
> > needs to be fixed.
> >
>
> I think you
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:11 AM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:47 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:39 PM Amit Langote
> > wrote:
> > > Sorry that I didn't comment on this earlier, but I think either
> > > GetPubPartitionOptionRelations() or Inv
Hi Amit,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:47 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:39 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > Sorry that I didn't comment on this earlier, but I think either
> > GetPubPartitionOptionRelations() or InvalidatePublicationRels()
> > introduced in the commit 4548c76738b shoul
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:39 PM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila
> > >
> > > > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vi
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:38 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila
> >
> > > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 4:07 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> Thanks, your patches look good to me. I'll push them sometime next
> week after Tuesday unless there are any comments.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila
> > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the
On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila
> > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> > Attach new version patches which clean the table at the end.
> >
>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:15 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comment.
> Attach new version patches which clean the table at the end.
>
+ * For
On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Attach new version patches which addressed the comment.
>
> Thanks for fixing this issue. The bug gets fixed by the patch, I did not find
> any
> issues in my
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> From Tues, Sep 7, 2021 12:02 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:49 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I can reproduce this bug.
> > >
> > > I think the reason is it didn't invalidate all the leaf par
> > > ---
> > > PublicationAddTables
> > > publication_add_relation
> > > /* Invalidate relcache so that publication info is
> > > rebuilt. */
> > > CacheInvalidateRelcache(targetrel);
> > > ---
> > >
> > > In addition, this problem can happen in both ADD TA
From Tues, Sep 7, 2021 12:02 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:49 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> >
> > I can reproduce this bug.
> >
> > I think the reason is it didn't invalidate all the leaf partitions'
> > relcache when add a partitioned table to the publication, so the
>
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:49 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 3:59 PM tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > I met a problem when using logical replication. Maybe it's a bug in logical
> > replication.
> > When publishing a partition table without replica identity, update
>From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 3:59 PM tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> I met a problem when using logical replication. Maybe it's a bug in logical
> replication.
> When publishing a partition table without replica identity, update
> or delete operation can be successful in some cases.
>
> For example:
15 matches
Mail list logo