On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
> > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com 
> > > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> > Attach new version patches which clean the table at the end.
> >
> 
> + * For partitioned table contained in the publication, we must
> + * invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition
> + * trees, not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication.
> 
> Can we slightly change the above comment as: "For the partitioned tables, we
> must invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition 
> hierarchies,
> not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication. This is required
> because we implicitly publish the child tables when the parent table is
> published."
> 
> Apart from this, the patch looks good to me.
> 
> I think we need to back-patch this till v13. What do you think? 

I agreed.

Attach patches for back-branch, each has passed regression tests and pgindent.

Best regards,
Hou zj

Attachment: HEAD-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch
Description: HEAD-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch

Attachment: PG14-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch
Description: PG14-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch

Attachment: PG13-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch
Description: PG13-Invalidate-all-partitions-for-partitioned-table-in-p.patch

Reply via email to