On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:58:26AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:45 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>> The patch is rather simple as per the attached, with extended
>> regression tests included. I have not checked on back-branches yet,
>> but that's visibly wrong since 8b08f7d
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:45 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:16:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yes, something looks wrong with that. I have not looked at it in
> > details yet though. I'll see about that tomorrow.
>
> So.. When building the attribute map for a clo
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:45 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:16:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yes, something looks wrong with that. I have not looked at it in
> > details yet though. I'll see about that tomorrow.
>
> So.. When building the attribute map for a cl
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:16:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, something looks wrong with that. I have not looked at it in
> details yet though. I'll see about that tomorrow.
So.. When building the attribute map for a cloned index (with either
LIKE during the transformation or for part
Here's a slightly smaller repro:
https://gist.github.com/wkalt/36720f39c97567fa6cb18cf5c05ac60f
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:00:24PM -0700, Wyatt Alt wrote:
> I think this demonstrates a bug, tested in 11.5:
> https://gist.github.com/wkalt/a298fe82c564668c803b3537561e67a0
If this source goes away, then we would lose it. It is always better
to copy directly the example in the message sent to t
