On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 7:18 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:29 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:45 PM Etsuro Fujita
> > wrote:
> > > One thing I noticed is this bit:
> > >
> > > -- Clean up
> > > -DROP TABLE batch_table, batch_cp_upd_test, batch_table_
Hi Amit-san,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:29 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:45 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > One thing I noticed is this bit:
> >
> > -- Clean up
> > -DROP TABLE batch_table, batch_cp_upd_test, batch_table_p0,
> > batch_table_p1 CASCADE;
> > +DROP TABLE batch_tab
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:45 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:01 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > > Updated patch attached.
> >
> > I will review the patch a bit more, but I think
> > it would be committable.
>
> One thing I not
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:01 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > Updated patch attached.
>
> I will review the patch a bit more, but I think
> it would be committable.
One thing I noticed is this bit:
-- Clean up
-DROP TABLE batch_table, batch_cp_upd
Amit-san,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:47 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > * In postgresGetForeignModifyBatchSize():
> >
> > /*
> > -* Should never get called when the insert is being performed as part
> > of a
> > -* row movement operatio
Hi Fujita-san,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:47 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:17 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> > Rebased to fix a minor conflict with some recently committed
> > nodeModifyTable.c changes.
>
> Apologies for not having reviewed the patch. Here are some review comment
Amit-san,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:17 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> Rebased to fix a minor conflict with some recently committed
> nodeModifyTable.c changes.
Apologies for not having reviewed the patch. Here are some review comments:
* The patch conflicts with commit ffbb7e65a, so please update t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 9:30 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-08-24 12:03:59 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Tomas committed the bug-fix, so attaching a rebased version of the
> > patch for $subject.
>
> This patch is in the current CF, but doesn't apply:
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_2992.
Hi,
On 2021-08-24 12:03:59 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Tomas committed the bug-fix, so attaching a rebased version of the
> patch for $subject.
This patch is in the current CF, but doesn't apply:
http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_2992.log
marked the entry as waiting-on-author.
Greetings,
Andr
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:32 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:18 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > One of the test postgres_fdw has failed, can you please post an
> > updated patch for the fix:
> > test postgres_fdw ... FAILED (test process exited with
> > exit code 2)
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:18 PM vignesh C wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 7:35 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:39 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Amit Langote writes:
> > > > [ v6-0001-Allow-batching-of-inserts-during-cross-partition-.patch ]
> > >
> > > Per the cfbot, this i
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 7:35 AM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:39 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Amit Langote writes:
> > > [ v6-0001-Allow-batching-of-inserts-during-cross-partition-.patch ]
> >
> > Per the cfbot, this isn't applying anymore, so I'm setting it back
> > to Waiting o
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:39 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Amit Langote writes:
> > [ v6-0001-Allow-batching-of-inserts-during-cross-partition-.patch ]
>
> Per the cfbot, this isn't applying anymore, so I'm setting it back
> to Waiting on Author.
Rebased patch attached. Thanks for the reminder.
--
Am
Amit Langote writes:
> [ v6-0001-Allow-batching-of-inserts-during-cross-partition-.patch ]
Per the cfbot, this isn't applying anymore, so I'm setting it back
to Waiting on Author.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 6:39 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> > > Thanks! It looks good!
> >
> > Thanks for checking. I'll mark this as RfC.
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch cannot be applied to the latest head branch, it will be nice if you
> can rebase it.
Thanks, done.
> And when looking into the p
> > Thanks! It looks good!
>
> Thanks for checking. I'll mark this as RfC.
Hi,
The patch cannot be applied to the latest head branch, it will be nice if you
can rebase it.
And when looking into the patch, I have some comments on it.
1)
IIRC, After the commit c5b7ba4, the initialization of
mt
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:52 PM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:37 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > > 3) will the cmin in the output always be the same?
> > > +SELECT cmin, * FROM batch_cp_upd_test3;
> >
> > TBH, I am not so sure. Maybe it's not a good idea to rely on cmin
> > af
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:37 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > 3) will the cmin in the output always be the same?
> > +SELECT cmin, * FROM batch_cp_upd_test3;
>
> TBH, I am not so sure. Maybe it's not a good idea to rely on cmin
> after all. I've rewritten the tests to use a different method of
> determ
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:49 PM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:08 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> > Updated patch attached. I had to adjust the test case a little bit to
> > account for the changes of 86dc90056d, something I failed to notice
> > yesterday. Also, I expanded the test
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:08 PM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 1:16 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > In the description:
> >
> > cross-partition update of partitioned tables can't use batching
> > because ExecInitRoutingInfo() which initializes the insert target
> >
> > 'which'
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 1:16 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
>
> Hi,
> In the description:
>
> cross-partition update of partitioned tables can't use batching
> because ExecInitRoutingInfo() which initializes the insert target
>
> 'which' should be dropped since 'because' should start a sentence.
>
> +-- Chec
Hi,
In the description:
cross-partition update of partitioned tables can't use batching
because ExecInitRoutingInfo() which initializes the insert target
'which' should be dropped since 'because' should start a sentence.
+-- Check that batched inserts also works for inserts made during
inserts
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:13 PM wrote:
> Status updated to RfC in the commitfest app.
Patch fails to apply per cfbot, so rebased.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v3-0001-Allow-batching-of-inserts-during-cross-partition-.patch
Description: Binary data
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 9:59 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Hi Georgios,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:12 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 6:13 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7
Hi Georgios,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:12 PM wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 6:13 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:59 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
> > > On Friday, March 12, 2021 3:45 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > By the way, the test ca
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 6:13 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Hi Georgios,
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:59 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > On Friday, March 12, 2021 3:45 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:
Hi Georgios,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:59 PM wrote:
> On Friday, March 12, 2021 3:45 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:36 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:42 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > What we do support how
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, March 12, 2021 3:45 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:36 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:42 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:30 PM Georgios gko
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:36 PM wrote:
> On Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:42 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:30 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > I continued looking a bit at the patch, yet I am either failing to see
> > > fix or I am
> > > looking at t
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:42 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Hi Georgios,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:30 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > I continued looking a bit at the patch, yet I am either failing to see fix
> > or I am
> > looking a
Hi Georgios,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:30 PM Georgios wrote:
> I continued looking a bit at the patch, yet I am either failing to see fix or
> I am
> looking at the wrong thing. Please find attached a small repro of what my
> expectetions
> were.
>
> As you can see in the repro, I would expect
Hi Georgios,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:54 AM Georgios Kokolatos
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the patch. I had a first look and played around with the code.
>
> The code seems clean, complete, and does what it says on the tin. I will
> need a bit more time to acclimatise with all the use cases f
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 1:23 PM, Georgios
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:54 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail
Hi,
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:54 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Based on the discussion at:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6929d485-2d2a-da46-3681-4a400a3d794f%40en
Hi,
thanks for the patch. I had a first look and played around with the code.
The code seems clean, complete, and does what it says on the tin. I will
need a bit more time to acclimatise with all the use cases for a more
thorough review.
I small question though is why expose PartitionTupleRoutin
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Based on the discussion at:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6929d485-2d2a-da46-3681-4a400a3d794f%40enterprisedb.com
>
> I'm posting the patch for $subject here in this new thread and I'll
> add it to the next CF per Tomas' advice.
36 matches
Mail list logo
