On 3/24/20 10:58 AM, David Steele wrote:
On 11/29/19 12:22 AM, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
>
I couldn't understand what you meant.
Do you say that we shouldn't change pqWait() behavior?
Or should I modify my patch to use pqDropConnection()?
This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cpu
On 11/29/19 12:22 AM, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:56:28AM +, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
It seems that you did not think so at that time.
# Please refer to [1]
I don't think all the reviewers are completely negative.
I recall
Hi, Michael-san.
Sorry, I have missed your e-mail...
> From: Michael Paquier
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:56:28AM +, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > It seems that you did not think so at that time.
> > # Please refer to [1]
> >
> > I don't think all the reviewers are completely negativ
Michaël,
Not this round.
You have registered yourself as a reviewer of this patch since the end
of June. Could you please avoid that? Sometimes people skips patches
when they see someone already registered to review it.
Yep. ISTM that I did a few reviews on early versions of the patch, wh
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:25:07PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Not this round.
You have registered yourself as a reviewer of this patch since the end
of June. Could you please avoid that? Sometimes people skips patches
when they see someone already registered to review it.
The patch applies c
By the way, Fabien, you are marked as a reviewer of this patch since the
end of June. Are you planning to review it?
Not this round.
--
Fabien.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:38:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I recall having a negative impression on the patch when first looking
> at it, and still have the same impression when looking at the last
> version. Just with a quick look, assuming that you can bypass all
> cleanup operations nor
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:56:28AM +, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> It seems that you did not think so at that time.
> # Please refer to [1]
>
> I don't think all the reviewers are completely negative.
I recall having a negative impression on the patch when first looking
at it, and stil
Hi, Michael-san.
> From: Michael Paquier
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:36AM +, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > I don't think that the rest one of my proposals has been rejected
> > completely, so I want to restart discussion.
> I recall on the matter that there was consensus that nobo
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:36AM +, nagaura.ryo...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I don't think that the rest one of my proposals has been rejected
> completely, so I want to restart discussion.
I recall on the matter that there was consensus that nobody really
liked this option because it enforced a
10 matches
Mail list logo
