On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:38:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I recall having a negative impression on the patch when first looking > at it, and still have the same impression when looking at the last > version. Just with a quick look, assuming that you can bypass all > cleanup operations normally taken by pqDropConnection() through a > hijacking of pqWait() is not fine as this routine explicitely assumes > to *never* have a timeout for its wait.
By the way, Fabien, you are marked as a reviewer of this patch since the end of June. Are you planning to review it? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
