On 5/16/20 7:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>>> On 16 May 2020, at 03:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Agreed. PQsslKeyPassHook__type sounds fine to me as
>>> convention. Wouldn't we want to also rename PQsetSSLKeyPassHook and
>>> PQgetSSLKeyPassHook, appending an "_OpenSSL"
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 16 May 2020, at 03:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Agreed. PQsslKeyPassHook__type sounds fine to me as
>> convention. Wouldn't we want to also rename PQsetSSLKeyPassHook and
>> PQgetSSLKeyPassHook, appending an "_OpenSSL" to both?
> Yes, I think we should. The at
On 5/16/20 3:16 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 16 May 2020, at 03:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:21:52PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> +1 on all of the above.
>>>
>>> I noticed this has been added to Open Items; I added a note that the
>>> plan is to fix befor
On 5/15/20 8:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-15, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which
>>> IMO is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook__type would
>>> be one optio
> On 16 May 2020, at 03:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:21:52PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> +1 on all of the above.
>>
>> I noticed this has been added to Open Items; I added a note that the
>> plan is to fix before the Beta 1 wrap.
>
> +1. Thanks.
>
> Agreed.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:21:52PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> +1 on all of the above.
>
> I noticed this has been added to Open Items; I added a note that the
> plan is to fix before the Beta 1 wrap.
+1. Thanks.
Agreed. PQsslKeyPassHook__type sounds fine to me as
convention. Wouldn't we
On 5/15/20 8:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which IMO
>>> is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook__type would be one
>>> option, but perhaps there are
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which IMO
>> is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook__type would be one
>> option, but perhaps there are better alternatives?
> ISTM this should
On 2020-May-15, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which
> > IMO is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook__type would
> > be one option, but perhaps there are better alternatives?
>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Reviewing TLS changes for v13 I came across one change which I think might
> be
> better off with a library qualified name. The libpq frontend sslpassword
> hook
> added in 4dc63552109f65 is OpenSSL specific, but it has a very generic
>
Reviewing TLS changes for v13 I came across one change which I think might be
better off with a library qualified name. The libpq frontend sslpassword hook
added in 4dc63552109f65 is OpenSSL specific, but it has a very generic name:
PQsetSSLKeyPassHook(PQsslKeyPassHook_type hook);
This I
11 matches
Mail list logo
