On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 13:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> # Proposal for new process
I just announced an upcoming commitfest app release[1], following the
discussion on this topic at the FOSDEM dev meeting.
The rest of the conclusion is that we'll roughly follow the approach
outlined in this orig
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 7:57 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>
> (Resent because sending to both -hackers and -www gets emails put in
> the moderation queue, and I don't want to introduce that delay to all
> replies. If you received the previous version because you're in the CC
> please only reply to
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 05:38, Umar Hayat wrote:
> +1 in github you can enforce a minimum number of reviewers. IMO there
> should be a minimum of two reviewers and one of the reviewers should
> be from the security group/role.
In a perfect world I'd agree, but I don't think there are currently
eno
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 06:29, Akshat Jaimini
wrote:
> I'll be happy to submit a PR with some basic tests on the repository.
Sounds good, what basic tests do you have in mind?
I have this auto-formatting PR open that also adds some github
actions: https://github.com/JelteF/commitfest/pull/1
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 at 19:09, Yura Sokolov wrote:
> Given history of libxz backdoor, I'd fear to give "commit access" for
> anything critical to rather fresh member of community.
That's definitely a valid concern in the general case, but I wouldn't
call myself a fresh member of the community. I'v
>
> Magnus wants reviews before deployment to be required, in an effort to
> get as close-to-perfect commits as possible. I, on the other hand,
> think that the benefit of close-to-perfect commits is not worth the
> delays in deploying that those reviews currently introduce. I'd rather
> deploy cod
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 03:09, Yura Sokolov wrote:
>
> 23.01.2025 15:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio пишет:
> > (Resent because sending to both -hackers and -www gets emails put in
> > the moderation queue, and I don't want to introduce that delay to all
> > replies. If you received the previous version beca
23.01.2025 15:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio пишет:
(Resent because sending to both -hackers and -www gets emails put in
the moderation queue, and I don't want to introduce that delay to all
replies. If you received the previous version because you're in the CC
please only reply to this one)
# Background
This seems like a great idea !
Maybe we can start out by adding some basic CI tests on the mirror
repository to sort of 'dry run' the new process?
I'll be happy to submit a PR with some basic tests on the repository.
Regards,
Akshat Jaimini
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:48 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio
wro
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 01:25, Jacob Brazeal wrote:
>>
>> Magnus wants reviews before deployment to be required, in an effort to
>> get as close-to-perfect commits as possible. I, on the other hand,
>> think that the benefit of close-to-perfect commits is not worth the
>> delays in deploying that
(Resent because sending to both -hackers and -www gets emails put in
the moderation queue, and I don't want to introduce that delay to all
replies. If you received the previous version because you're in the CC
please only reply to this one)
# Background
As some of you might have noticed I've been
11 matches
Mail list logo
