On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 02:40:54PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Sounds good, thanks!
Okay, done then.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On 3 Jun 2020, at 14:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I don't have a problem with the existing wording of the first sentence, and I
>> don't have a problem with your suggestion either (as long as it's parameters
>> in
>> plura
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I don't have a problem with the existing wording of the first sentence, and I
> don't have a problem with your suggestion either (as long as it's parameters
> in
> plural).
Thanks, that's why I kept the word plural in my own sug
> On 1 Jun 2020, at 08:06, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The problem I have with first and second flavors is that "DH
> parameters files" does not sound right. First, the grammar sounds
> incorrect to me as in this case "parameters" should not be plural.
I think "parameters" is the right term here,
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 05:47:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:54 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> I don't understand why that change is an improvement.
Oops. I have managed to copy-paste an incorrect diff. The existing
comment is that:
* To prevent problems if the DH para
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:54 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
> > if others have any comments.
>
> Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like i
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
> if others have any comments.
Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its
first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me:
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 05:15:17PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The comment in be-secure-openssl.c didn't get the memo that the hardcoded DH
> parameters moved in 573bd08b99e277026e87bb55ae69c489fab321b8. The attached
> updates the wording, keeping it generic enough that we wont need to updat
The comment in be-secure-openssl.c didn't get the memo that the hardcoded DH
parameters moved in 573bd08b99e277026e87bb55ae69c489fab321b8. The attached
updates the wording, keeping it generic enough that we wont need to update it
should the parameters move again.
cheers ./daniel
openssl_dh_com
