On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first > if others have any comments.
Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me: * Load hardcoded DH parameters. * - * To prevent problems if the DH parameter files don't even exist, we - * can load hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend. + * If DH parameters cannot be loaded from a specified file, we can load + * the hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend to prevent + * problems. Daniel, is that fine for you? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
