On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 6:56 AM Matthias van de Meent
wrote:
> Apart from comments on comment contents and placement, no specific issues:
Pushed this just now. Thanks for the review!
> > + *
> > + * Initialize arrays during first (unscheduled) primitive index scan.
> > + */
>
> I thin
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 at 17:38, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> Attached patch goes a bit further with simplifying _bt_first's
> handling of seizing the parallel scan. This continues recent work from
> commits 4e6e375b and b5ee4e52.
>
> Aside from requiring less code, the new structure relieves _bt_first
Attached patch goes a bit further with simplifying _bt_first's
handling of seizing the parallel scan. This continues recent work from
commits 4e6e375b and b5ee4e52.
Aside from requiring less code, the new structure relieves _bt_first
from having separate calls to _bt_start_array_keys for the seria