On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:47:34PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> More accurately, I didn't come up with the way to split out some of
> the rule-components in a rule out as another rule using the existing
> infrastructure.
>
> [...]
>
> Then add the following component to the rule "stmt".
I se
Thanks for the comment.
At Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:17:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 06:45:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Separating "CREATE TABLE AS EXECUTE" from ExecuteStmt would be cleaner
> > but I avoided to change the syntax tree. Instead the attched ma
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 06:45:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Separating "CREATE TABLE AS EXECUTE" from ExecuteStmt would be cleaner
> but I avoided to change the syntax tree. Instead the attched make
> distinction of $$.type of ExecuteStmt between NULL and "" to use to
> notify the returned
At Thu, 01 Jul 2021 18:45:25 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> I'll post the test part later.
A version incluedes the test part.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
>From 6ef902608483f395983da5063db3e0af8d61ed4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyotaro Horiguc
Hello.
While I looked a patch, I found that the following ECPG statement
generates uncompilable .c source.
EXEC SQL CREATE TABLE t AS stmt;
ecpgtest.c:
#line 42 "ecpgtest.pgc"
printf("1:dbname=%s\n", dbname);
{ ECPGdo(__LINE__, 0, 1, NULL, 0, ECPGst_execute, crea
